Hi there,
Please reply for my query.
My husband came Canada on visitor visa and stated at the airport that he came for tourism. But he had job offer and LMIA so he went on border in Canada after 4 days to submit his work visa application but an immigration officer refused his application and imposed section 40 (1) a, inadmissible for misrepresentation and told leave country within week. My question is, I asked an advisor that for how long he’s been banned but he said on his letter which been given by officer didn’t say he is banned. Advisor said there are two types of inadmissible section, in one there is bann and in other no ban. Moreover other officer who seized his passport said when he will report at airport in given time period there will be no charge for inadmissible and they will remove all charges and he can apply work visa outside Canada.
Is it true after getting 40(1)a not necessary to ban for five.
Please answer my question.
Please reply for my query.
My husband came Canada on visitor visa and stated at the airport that he came for tourism. But he had job offer and LMIA so he went on border in Canada after 4 days to submit his work visa application but an immigration officer refused his application and imposed section 40 (1) a, inadmissible for misrepresentation and told leave country within week. My question is, I asked an advisor that for how long he’s been banned but he said on his letter which been given by officer didn’t say he is banned. Advisor said there are two types of inadmissible section, in one there is bann and in other no ban. Moreover other officer who seized his passport said when he will report at airport in given time period there will be no charge for inadmissible and they will remove all charges and he can apply work visa outside Canada.
Is it true after getting 40(1)a not necessary to ban for five.
Please answer my question.