Alright! Makes sense. Thanks again for putting all together.I think this may be a CPC vs local visa office thing. I can change it if you like, but I don't want to overcomplicate things.
Alright! Makes sense. Thanks again for putting all together.I think this may be a CPC vs local visa office thing. I can change it if you like, but I don't want to overcomplicate things.
Thanks can u add me tooDone.
And just so everyone knows, I am not adding people to the table who get their PPR but were not previously on the table. The reason is that if the table doesn't have "silent readers" in the section still waiting for PPR, I don't want to add them to the PPR section or it will artificially show a higher percentage of PPRs vs. people still waiting.
Still glad to add any silent readers who want to be on the table, just post your details here before you get PPR
Done.
And just so everyone knows, I am not adding people to the table who get their PPR but were not previously on the table. The reason is that if the table doesn't have "silent readers" in the section still waiting for PPR, I don't want to add them to the PPR section or it will artificially show a higher percentage of PPRs vs. people still waiting.
Still glad to add any silent readers who want to be on the table, just post your details here before you get PPR
Updated table:
This table is so helpful thanks for the update. I recently found out that my eligibility, criminality, and security are all passed so we are waiting for the final review by the officer! My processing office is Ottawa. Please feel free to update my info. Thank you so much!
Please add my infoDone.
And just so everyone knows, I am not adding people to the table who get their PPR but were not previously on the table. The reason is that if the table doesn't have "silent readers" in the section still waiting for PPR, I don't want to add them to the PPR section or it will artificially show a higher percentage of PPRs vs. people still waiting.
Still glad to add any silent readers who want to be on the table, just post your details here before you get PPR
Please add me to the table too.Done! Thanks for the update.
Hi ,Please add me to the table too.
Kaurkaur
CPC- Ottawa
Aor- 9 Oct
FSW-O
IP2-1 March
E- RR
C- passed
S- Not started
Wats Ur RR for? Got notes or sent supporting documents through CSE yetPlease add me to the table too.
Kaurkaur
CPC- Ottawa
Aor- 9 Oct
FSW-O
IP2-1 March
E- RR
C- passed
S- Not started
And under review is different from review required. If under review then u can be in BG check phase.Please add me to the table too.
Kaurkaur
CPC- Ottawa
Aor- 9 Oct
FSW-O
IP2-1 March
E- RR
C- passed
S- Not started
How do you probe this right to the agent .?? They are not willing to provide proper information and end up confusing us.. if it's under review or review required..And under review is different from review required. If under review then u can be in BG check phase.
Please you can add me to the table also if my information isn't too complicated...lolDone.
And just so everyone knows, I am not adding people to the table who get their PPR but were not previously on the table. The reason is that if the table doesn't have "silent readers" in the section still waiting for PPR, I don't want to add them to the PPR section or it will artificially show a higher percentage of PPRs vs. people still waiting.
Still glad to add any silent readers who want to be on the table, just post your details here before you get PPR
But even Wes does not state years or length of program.Got my notes today...
It's "Review Required" as IQAS did not stated years of study in my PGDBA assessment.
Rest all the things are having same statement "appears met"
or individually speaking...
Criminality - passed
Security - Not started.
Rest all met.
Now God knows... How to justify IRCC about a report which IQAS (another Canadian Govt. agency ) generates.