Montreal Visa Office ... Let's connect here.
- Thread starter cansha
- Start date
PA means Primary Applicant. They are referring to you answering stat questions as "yes" on your application. Stat questions mean statutory question which are asked on application related to previous visa refusals, detainment or arrests. Seems like your answer to all those questions was yes. Any application which has either of these questions answered as Yes is in Review Required.
They already asked it on application and you said Yes.
What was the ADR for?
Seems like you had applied for a Study Permit to Canada which was refused. The analyst is just referring to that refusal and asking the visa officer to take a second look.
Appears met is minimum qualifying criteria. Review Required is for all the stat questions
Because that is how it works. CIO may or may not do your eligibility test.
Montreal atleast till the time GCMS notes were generated. It could have or may change in the future if file gets reassigned to Ottawa or any other visa offices.
Thank you very much Cansha.
I started guessing that they are trying to find at least smth to refuse my PR application.
ADR was for devorce certificate. I sent it the same day (I just forgot to attach it when submitting application)
Now I regret that I mentioned my detaintion. PR application was the only one that contained that word "detaintion". All others had "arrest" or "criminal charges". There is no way they could find out about "detaintion", but I still indicated it on the form (idiot
I started guessing that they are trying to find at least smth to refuse my PR application.
ADR was for devorce certificate. I sent it the same day (I just forgot to attach it when submitting application)
Now I regret that I mentioned my detaintion. PR application was the only one that contained that word "detaintion". All others had "arrest" or "criminal charges". There is no way they could find out about "detaintion", but I still indicated it on the form (idiot
Did you submit a police certificate from Russia/Moscow? If yes, did they mention anything about these incidents?Thank you very much Cansha.
I started guessing that they are trying to find at least smth to refuse my PR application.
ADR was for devorce certificate. I sent it the same day (I just forgot to attach it when submitting application)
Now I regret that I mentioned my detaintion. PR application was the only one that contained that word "detaintion". All others had "arrest" or "criminal charges". There is no way they could find out about "detaintion", but I still indicated it on the form (idiot
Of course, I did.
There is no mention.
It's like a Canadian police certificate. Will you find in it your ticket for speeding? No.
Btw, can they start security screening before the end of eligibility?
I guess they will spend 3-9 months on review of eligibility and only then they will send me to SS
Smells like we'll be waiting 1 year plus... and in the end they will refuse based on some formality like their US coleagues.
Do you think it would be a good idea to send them the video and photos of this detention to speed up the process? Or it will only slow it down?
I guess they will spend 3-9 months on review of eligibility and only then they will send me to SS
Smells like we'll be waiting 1 year plus... and in the end they will refuse based on some formality like their US coleagues.
Do you think it would be a good idea to send them the video and photos of this detention to speed up the process? Or it will only slow it down?
You did the right thing by disclosing these incidents even though your pcc wouldn't show anything about it, because you never know whether your background check would reveal these incidents or not. From the information you have provided, I don't see any grounds of inadmissibility related to criminal history (this is my personal judgment).
I would suggest that you consult a canadian immigration lawyer (Mark holthe is a good lawyer ) and he is experienced enough to guide you exactly on what actions you need to take (If needed).Btw, can they start security screening before the end of eligibility?
I guess they will spend 3-9 months on review of eligibility and only then they will send me to SS
Smells like we'll be waiting 1 year plus... and in the end they will refuse based on some formality like their US coleagues.
Do you think it would be a good idea to send them the video and photos of this detention to speed up the process? Or it will only slow it down?
Im not a criminal, so they cant refuse based on this. But I guess they can accuse me of misrepresentation. They can say that this was not a detaintion, it was an arrest. So, I "lied" on my previous applications.
Thanks for your advice, but I think I will need a lawyer if they refuse, not now.
oh man, this is heartbreaking
The processing times at Montreal office are the worst.