Invitation Letter (2 options, which one is better) Family Visit

[1122khan11]

My wife wants to visit Canada (with two minor kids) to visit her father who is aged and critically ill (this is the main purpose). I am fully capable and sponsoring my wife visit to Canada. I am not travelling with them to Canada. I have property too in my home country and heavy genuine finances, etc etc

I am explaining the situation below and my question is that who should give the invitation letter?

Option 1

My father in law lives with wife and one unmarried son. Both parents are aged and on govt assistance and had never worked in the past. The son work in office on average salary. They are in Canada for around 4 years. All three just became Canadian Citizens in 2019. They got PR through Asylum, through a genuine case and now citizens.

Option 2

My sister in law is also a Canadian Citizen for more than 12 years. She works there and tax payer. Her husband has a medium sized business and financially stable with 3 children and self owned house. The family is financially stable.

Question? Since I am sponsoring my wife visit and taking the financial responsibility, now tell me who should give my wife the invitation letter and why or why not? If father should invite then the case is very simple! But those who think that sister should invite (because of financial condition) then how this could be linked and connected to the purpose of visit (to see ill father), because sister is married and she live separately plus who is she too invite on behalf of her father?

Please guide....

 

[Bryanna]

My wife wants to visit Canada (with two minor kids) to visit her father who is aged and critically ill (this is the main purpose). I am fully capable and sponsoring my wife visit to Canada. I am not travelling with them to Canada. I have property too in my home country and heavy genuine finances, etc etc

I am explaining the situation below and my question is that who should give the invitation letter?

Option 1

My father in law lives with wife and one unmarried son. Both parents are aged and on govt assistance and had never worked in the past. The son work in office on average salary. They are in Canada for around 4 years. All three just became Canadian Citizens in 2019. They got PR through Asylum, through a genuine case and now citizens.

Option 2

My sister in law is also a Canadian Citizen for more than 12 years. She works there and tax payer. Her husband has a medium sized business and financially stable with 3 children and self owned house. The family is financially stable.

Question? Since I am sponsoring my wife visit and taking the financial responsibility, now tell me who should give my wife the invitation letter and why or why not? If father should invite then the case is very simple! But those who think that sister should invite (because of financial condition) then how this could be linked and connected to the purpose of visit (to see ill father), because sister is married and she live separately plus who is she too invite on behalf of her father?

Please guide....

1. For TRVs, the onus is on the applicant to prove s/he won't be financially dependent on her/his Canadian host. This means the host's finances are irrelevant/secondary to the application.

2. As she intends to meet her dad who is critically sick then it would be a good idea if her brother or her mom provide the invitation letter.

3. As her family were granted citizenship through the asylum path, it would be advisable if your wife applies alone.... without your kids.... for better chances of a TRV approval. Your minor kids will be strong family ties for her to return to.

4. Her visit must be for a short 2-3 weeks + supported by medical evidence of her dad's condition + statements/evidence that he has other family members/caregivers and your wife is not like to overstay her visit nor become a caregiver (considered as illegal work).

5. Hope your wife has traveled to other visa-required countries + she can demonstrate other ties to her country of residence

 

[1122khan11]

many thanks bryanna for your answers:
1) it means that there is not need to take any letter from her sister who is already well settled.
2) he is able to sign the letter, so we are thinking to get the letter from him/father, with his actual feelings and desire mentioned in it plus other things.
3) Good advice regarding children, but they are under 7....May be they will travel with mom.
4) Yes medical letter is taken from doctor. Point of caregiver is new for me...and i got it. I think i should mention that her sister is there to take care and my wife only want to visit to meet her father
5) Travel history is not very good except Dubai and home country. Unfortunately her more ties are towards Canada, but only me and her one married sister here could be considered as close ties....Can we consider maternal and paternal uncle aunts as Family Ties. Plus we have property in home country which we are mentioning as financial ties.

There is a question in the form " Funds Available for my Stay" Shall i mention my whole Cash Funds or only the amount which may be required to Visit Canada. Is there any negative of showing more than required genuine funds?
a) For e.g if someone has about CAD$ 100,000/- in his banks. Shall he mention CAD$ 100,000/- or CAD$ 50,000/- as Funds Available for the Stay
b) If he mention CAD $ 50,000/ then shall he mention 30,000 for main applicant and 10000 + 10,000 for each Child. Because you have to fill each form separately and in every form there is an option of Funds available for the stay, even for kids.

Awaiting your guidance on this plz

 

[canuck_in_uk]

many thanks bryanna for your answers:
1) it means that there is not need to take any letter from her sister who is already well settled.
2) he is able to sign the letter, so we are thinking to get the letter from him/father, with his actual feelings and desire mentioned in it plus other things.
3) Good advice regarding children, but they are under 7....May be they will travel with mom.
4) Yes medical letter is taken from doctor. Point of caregiver is new for me...and i got it. I think i should mention that her sister is there to take care and my wife only want to visit to meet her father
5) Travel history is not very good except Dubai and home country. Unfortunately her more ties are towards Canada, but only me and her one married sister here could be considered as close ties....Can we consider maternal and paternal uncle aunts as Family Ties. Plus we have property in home country which we are mentioning as financial ties.

There is a question in the form " Funds Available for my Stay" Shall i mention my whole Cash Funds or only the amount which may be required to Visit Canada. Is there any negative of showing more than required genuine funds?
a) For e.g if someone has about CAD$ 100,000/- in his banks. Shall he mention CAD$ 100,000/- or CAD$ 50,000/- as Funds Available for the Stay
b) If he mention CAD $ 50,000/ then shall he mention 30,000 for main applicant and 10000 + 10,000 for each Child. Because you have to fill each form separately and in every form there is an option of Funds available for the stay, even for kids.

Awaiting your guidance on this plz

3. Doesn't matter how old they are. Given the fact that her family claimed asylum, she is a huge risk and her chances of approval are already quite low. Leaving the kids behind is a very strong tie and increases her chances.

 

[Bryanna]

many thanks bryanna for your answers:
1) it means that there is not need to take any letter from her sister who is already well settled.

Your wife can certainly include two invitation letters + supporting documents. That's acceptable.

2) he is able to sign the letter, so we are thinking to get the letter from him/father, with his actual feelings and desire mentioned in it plus other things.

Not too emotional. It would be addressed to the visa officer and must be formal.

3) Good advice regarding children, but they are under 7....May be they will travel with mom.

Not advisable. We have seen applicants (work permit and study permit i.e. long-stay applicants) who applied without their minor children (I remember at least two cases where the kids where as young as 2-3 years).... just to improve their chances of visa approvals.

In the case of your wife, the fact that her family claimed asylum will continue to overshadow her chances of a TRV approval. One solution is not to apply for TRVs for your children.

Also, your wife is not employed + she does not have independent sources of finances + no travel history (Dubai won't count) + no property ownership in her name, etc = No ties to your country of residence. Your children and you are the only ties to return to.

If she is not a citizen/permanent resident of the country she now resides in then she must also include proofs of her immigration status + any ties to her home country too.

4) Yes medical letter is taken from doctor. Point of caregiver is new for me...and i got it. I think i should mention that her sister is there to take care and my wife only want to visit to meet her father

Okay

5) Travel history is not very good except Dubai and home country. Unfortunately her more ties are towards Canada, but only me and her one married sister here could be considered as close ties....Can we consider maternal and paternal uncle aunts as Family Ties. Plus we have property in home country which we are mentioning as financial ties.

Her family ties are you and your children. Other extended family members won't help as family ties.

There is a question in the form " Funds Available for my Stay" Shall i mention my whole Cash Funds or only the amount which may be required to Visit Canada. Is there any negative of showing more than required genuine funds?

Are your finances in cash? Or do you have bank accounts, income tax assessments, etc?

 

[1122khan11]

I understand.... many thanks andy and canuck....& Bryanna ... Actually my father in law has never seen/met my children and he wanted to see them too. But lets see.......i am thinking to keep at least elder daughter with me...though ... she will be so upset. and i have to take her to somewhere else for tourism.. .The other cant as he is just 22 month.

Her sister did not took Asylum. Details as mentioned in option 2....Even if one she send the letter, it wont make difference?

My wife dont work, but she has a plot in her name whose installments are in process. Plus she has a small car in her name too.

Bryanna regarding finances they are in Banks in the form of Saving Account, Fixed Deposit, Some Shares etc. Plus my wife has Credit Cards too in here name.... I am arranging Travel Insurance too. My question is still the same

There is a question in the form " Funds Available for my Stay" Shall i mention my whole Funds or only the partial amount which may be required to Visit Canada. Is there any negative of showing large funds? or it is positive? (Because for actual visit even CAD 10,000 is good enough)
a) For e.g if someone has about CAD$ 100,000/- in 2 different banks. Shall he mention CAD$ 100,000/- of both banks or CAD$ 50,000/- of one bank as Funds Available for the Stay is advisable.
b) If he mention CAD $ 50,000/ then shall he mention 30,000 for main applicant and 10000 + 10,000 for each Child. Because you have to fill each form separately and in every form there is an option of Funds available for the stay, even for kids.

Your wife can certainly include two invitation letters + supporting documents. That's acceptable.



Not too emotional. It would be addressed to the visa officer and must be formal.



Not advisable. We have seen applicants (work permit and study permit i.e. long-stay applicants) who applied without their minor children (I remember at least two cases where the kids where as young as 2-3 years).... just to improve their chances of visa approvals.

In the case of your wife, the fact that her family claimed asylum will continue to overshadow her chances of a TRV approval. One solution is not to apply for TRVs for your children.

Also, your wife is not employed + she does not have independent sources of finances + no travel history (Dubai won't count) + no property ownership in her name, etc = No ties to your country of residence. Your children and you are the only ties to return to.

If she is not a citizen/permanent resident of the country she now resides in then she must also include proofs of her immigration status + any ties to her home country too.



Okay



Her family ties are you and your children. Other extended family members won't help as family ties.



Are your finances in cash? Or do you have bank accounts, income tax assessments, etc?

 

[Bryanna]

I understand.... many thanks andy and canuck....& Bryanna ... Actually my father in law has never seen/met my children and he wanted to see them too. But lets see.......i am thinking to keep at least elder daughter with me...though ... she will be so upset. and i have to take her to somewhere else for tourism.. .The other cant as he is just 22 month.

Unfortunately, immigration does not work on the basis of emotions.

Again, your wife does not have any ties to return to your country of residence except you and your minor children. The asylum history of her family only reduces the chances of her TRV approval. It's your call.

Her sister did not took Asylum. Details as mentioned in option 2....Even if one she send the letter, it wont make difference?

Zero difference. Your wife must complete the 'Family Information' form where she would declare her parents and brother/sister. In short, the fact that they were asylum claimants will instantly show up in IRCC records.

If she has temporary residence status in the country where she now resides.... and/or if she is applying for a TRV from a country which sees a large number of asylum seekers then her chances of a TRV approval will become slim to none.

My wife dont work, but she has a plot in her name whose installments are in process. Plus she has a small car in her name too.

These are not ties for her to return to because you purchased the plot and the car.

Bryanna regarding finances they are in Banks in the form of Saving Account, Fixed Deposit, Some Shares etc. Plus my wife has Credit Cards too in here name.... I am arranging Travel Insurance too. My question is still the same

There is a question in the form " Funds Available for my Stay" Shall i mention my whole Funds or only the partial amount which may be required to Visit Canada. Is there any negative of showing large funds? or it is positive? (Because for actual visit even CAD 10,000 is good enough)
a) For e.g if someone has about CAD$ 100,000/- in 2 different banks. Shall he mention CAD$ 100,000/- of both banks or CAD$ 50,000/- of one bank as Funds Available for the Stay is advisable.
b) If he mention CAD $ 50,000/ then shall he mention 30,000 for main applicant and 10000 + 10,000 for each Child. Because you have to fill each form separately and in every form there is an option of Funds available for the stay, even for kids.

In the cover letter, you can mention the total amount available with you (all bank balances and investments that can be liquidated + other investments that won't be liquidated to pay for the visit). You need to provide copies of each of these + your tax assessments + a Letter of Financial support signed by you offering to cover the costs of her visit, airfare, etc.

In the form, she can put a reasonable amount for a 2-3 weeks' stay. Ideally, a day-by-day detailed visit itinerary would give an idea for this amount

 

[1122khan11]

1) I agree to your point for how they think... But actually visiting ill relative is an emotional element and all those who intend to travel for family visit involve emotional element. And the bitter fact is that Canada is neither a famous Tourist Place nor it is a place to Visit for Business Purpose or Business Conference....and lastly not worthy for the Medical Treatment either. And all those who claim the visit for that purpose, 90% are telling a lie.

Yes there family took Asylum because of some specific happening.
Also they must know that in Asian Cultures properties are mainly owned by Husbands. And it is the strong bounding / tie for both of them. Especially if the price is more than CAD 300,000/- and it is assessed by Official Assessors. (Plus it is not on installment/lease). They must also know that unlike US/Canada, no body leaves the property behind...., because of the fear of land grabbers.

Secondly., estimating the monthly expense of Canada, if someone can prove he/she can live for 20 years without even burden on Canadian Government or even not doing a job in Canada, they must not be worried.....but its their call, what type of people they encourage / discourage to come to their country...!

2) Yes agreed. I was thinking may be it was the matter of financial ability of the one who is sponsoring / inviting.
Nope... we are from Karachi, Pakistan and not temporary residing in any other country...

3) Her plot and car is mainly from the money she got in inheritance. And even if i gifted her, it is hers now..

4) Ok thanks. But u did not mention if i want to mention "Funds Available for Stay" for e.g 30,000CAD. Shall i break up 20,000 to be written in wife form and 10,000 to be written in child form?, because everyone has separate form.

And there is a last question.....there is question 2c in form 5257 " Have you previously applied to enter or remain in Canada"? What shall i reply. because in 2011 i applied (with my wife) under 1122 code for immigration as Fed Skilled Worker, but quota was reached and my fees and application was returned. It was not rejected. Shall i answer Yes. Plus do u think it is also a negative point.....showing intentions of immigration...though it is a 7 year earlier story.

Unfortunately, immigration does not work on the basis of emotions.

1) Again, your wife does not have any ties to return to your country of residence except you and your minor children. The asylum history of her family only reduces the chances of her TRV approval. It's your call.

2) Zero difference. Your wife must complete the 'Family Information' form where she would declare her parents and brother/sister. In short, the fact that they were asylum claimants will instantly show up in IRCC records.

If she has temporary residence status in the country where she now resides.... and/or if she is applying for a TRV from a country which sees a large number of asylum seekers then her chances of a TRV approval will become slim to none.



3) These are not ties for her to return to because you purchased the plot and the car.



4) In the cover letter, you can mention the total amount available with you (all bank balances and investments that can be liquidated + other investments that won't be liquidated to pay for the visit). You need to provide copies of each of these + your tax assessments + a Letter of Financial support signed by you offering to cover the costs of her visit, airfare, etc.

In the form, she can put a reasonable amount for a 2-3 weeks' stay. Ideally, a day-by-day detailed visit itinerary would give an idea for this amount

 

[Bryanna]

1) I agree to your point for how they think... But actually visiting ill relative is an emotional element and all those who intend to travel for family visit involve emotional element. And the bitter fact is that Canada is neither a famous Tourist Place nor it is a place to Visit for Business Purpose or Business Conference....and lastly not worthy for the Medical Treatment either. And all those who claim the visit for that purpose, 90% are telling a lie.

Now that her family members are citizens, they can travel to Pakistan or any other country to meet her. Not referring to her dad but other family members.

It's most unfortunate that you have very negative views about Canada.... especially considering that your wife's family have claimed asylum and they have recently become Canadian citizens.

Also they must know that in Asian Cultures properties are mainly owned by Husbands.

Not true. The women of some Asian cultures are forward thinkers, highly educated and work as equals with men. This means they have the financial means to purchase properties with their income without depending on their male relatives to support them financially.

And it is the strong bounding / tie for both of them. Especially if the price is more than CAD 300,000/- and it is assessed by Official Assessors. (Plus it is not on installment/lease). They must also know that unlike US/Canada, no body leaves the property behind...., because of the fear of land grabbers.

Sorry. Property valued at CAD 300,000+ is not considered to be a prime property.

Secondly., estimating the monthly expense of Canada, if someone can prove he/she can live for 20 years without even burden on Canadian Government or even not doing a job in Canada, they must not be worried.....but its their call, what type of people they encourage / discourage to come to their country...!

Being granted a visa is a privilege and not a right. Canada will grant entry to visitors that understand that there are immigration rules to adhere to. Someone cannot just *live* in Canada for 20 years by mistakenly believing that his/her finances give him/her this right.

2) Yes agreed. I was thinking may be it was the matter of financial ability of the one who is sponsoring / inviting.
Nope... we are from Karachi, Pakistan and not temporary residing in any other country...

Okay

3) Her plot and car is mainly from the money she got in inheritance. And even if i gifted her, it is hers now..

It does not work this way for visas.

And there is a last question.....there is question 2c in form 5257 " Have you previously applied to enter or remain in Canada"? What shall i reply. because in 2011 i applied (with my wife) under 1122 code for immigration as Fed Skilled Worker, but quota was reached and my fees and application was returned. It was not rejected. Shall i answer Yes. Plus do u think it is also a negative point.....showing intentions of immigration...though it is a 7 year earlier story.

She must answer 'Yes'


Good luck!

 

[1122khan11]

....Nothing to annoy you, even if you are Canadian or not. Plus you are a very helping member and your guidance is helping me a lot and many others. Trust me i don't have negative views, there are great number of positive things in Canada, its Govt and in its people, which no where in the world has! But there are lot of flaws arise only because of the immigration system related to education, business, entrepreneur, refugee, visit etc, which cant be discussed here in detail...there are many thing that are cannibalizing each other. (the only thing i will say, because of this system.... cream (or precisely A Graders in every field) goes somewhere else and Canada only gets the left overs, from the world)

.... I wish if my relatives there could have earned / saved enough money while living for about 6 years in Canada, so that all of them could have traveled here to meet us frankly! Even i offered my services for the arrangement of ticket etc. (especially for mother in law), but she refused, may be due to father in law health conditions they cant travel and trust me.. that is the only truth! (i am more desirous ...that my wife should meet her parents, so that our home atmosphere get more pleasant and she should get relaxed for another 5 years at least, without missing them)

....Yes my brother who is Medical Consultant in US, he travel every year with family to Pakistan, by virtue of his status / income in US.

... Ok nothing to be personal for anyone... women in Asia are doing great too. I was talking in general...

.....I know paid property valued at CAD 300K+ is not valued in Canada, even not in cities like Karachi. But it is at least better than the property on 20 year loan / lease/mortgage/installment. Moreover, its not the matter of amount, its the matter of Financial Tie. And off course i cant disclose every thing of mine in this forum. Plus plus plus ....putting all your money in one basket (that is property) is a great financial risk......!

.....I know its not the right. Funds for 20 years was just an illustration in respect to Burden on Canadian Economy. As Canada have Jack of All Trades.....and I have met and seen a lot of settled people / white collar people / entrepreneurs who immigrated to Canada (through legitimate means) from different parts of the world, but because of the limited business, employment prospects and weather conditions, they were ended up on burden on Canadian Economy. Some in spite of that, went back to their home countries.

Thanks for Good Luck but please don't mind...any of my words....I am not from English Speaking Country and i don't know how to put buffer between the sentences to make them soft.

Someone send me this you tube link of news channel. "Do still immigration officers on duty think they are God", while making decisions!

Any how ... thank you again for your guidance and i hope you will continue to guide us wherever and whenever required.....

Now that her family members are citizens, they can travel to Pakistan or any other country to meet her. Not referring to her dad but other family members.

It's most unfortunate that you have very negative views about Canada.... especially considering that your wife's family have claimed asylum and they have recently become Canadian citizens.



Not true. The women of some Asian cultures are forward thinkers, highly educated and work as equals with men. This means they have the financial means to purchase properties with their income without depending on their male relatives to support them financially.



Sorry. Property valued at CAD 300,000+ is not considered to be a prime property.



Being granted a visa is a privilege and not a right. Canada will grant entry to visitors that understand that there are immigration rules to adhere to. Someone cannot just *live* in Canada for 20 years by mistakenly believing that his/her finances give him/her this right.



Okay



It does not work this way for visas.



She must answer 'Yes'


Good luck!

 

[Elbagurl]

Nobody cares what Asian culture is or other cultures are when it comes to eligibility requirements.
Mainly own from husbands ?
And they should know that?
Who should've known ?

Why you remind me so many people asking questions at my work about showing under their name proof of address document on behalf of their wives and THE GET REFUSED.

Waw so you are enforcing the assumption that women are oppressed in Asian culture ?
Are they ?
If her father is sick and getting TRV aproval by applying only for her self is the best option, it is your time now to step forward and help her by babysitting your kids AND LET HER GO.

 

[Jets13]

1) I agree to your point for how they think... But actually visiting ill relative is an emotional element and all those who intend to travel for family visit involve emotional element. And the bitter fact is that Canada is neither a famous Tourist Place nor it is a place to Visit for Business Purpose or Business Conference....and lastly not worthy for the Medical Treatment either. And all those who claim the visit for that purpose, 90% are telling a lie.

Yes there family took Asylum because of some specific happening.
Also they must know that in Asian Cultures properties are mainly owned by Husbands. And it is the strong bounding / tie for both of them. Especially if the price is more than CAD 300,000/- and it is assessed by Official Assessors. (Plus it is not on installment/lease). They must also know that unlike US/Canada, no body leaves the property behind...., because of the fear of land grabbers.

Secondly., estimating the monthly expense of Canada, if someone can prove he/she can live for 20 years without even burden on Canadian Government or even not doing a job in Canada, they must not be worried.....but its their call, what type of people they encourage / discourage to come to their country...!

2) Yes agreed. I was thinking may be it was the matter of financial ability of the one who is sponsoring / inviting.
Nope... we are from Karachi, Pakistan and not temporary residing in any other country...

3) Her plot and car is mainly from the money she got in inheritance. And even if i gifted her, it is hers now..

4) Ok thanks. But u did not mention if i want to mention "Funds Available for Stay" for e.g 30,000CAD. Shall i break up 20,000 to be written in wife form and 10,000 to be written in child form?, because everyone has separate form.

And there is a last question.....there is question 2c in form 5257 " Have you previously applied to enter or remain in Canada"? What shall i reply. because in 2011 i applied (with my wife) under 1122 code for immigration as Fed Skilled Worker, but quota was reached and my fees and application was returned. It was not rejected. Shall i answer Yes. Plus do u think it is also a negative point.....showing intentions of immigration...though it is a 7 year earlier story.

I think Canada is trying to avoid people who come here never working a day in their lives and tax payers paying for them through govt assistance. Kind of like your in laws.

Perfect solution, you have enough funds to take care of them for 20 years maybe you should do that instead of the Canadian govt....and as a bonus everyone could meet everyone.

 

[1122khan11]

Eligibility requirements........... lol... its all bias, bookish and based on mood.....not based on sound judgement...that is why....its ending up large number of Asylum Claimers and burden on Canadian Economy.

Yes I am planning to let my wife travel to meet her ill father and aged parents and i will take the children for a trip to Turkey... for vacations..after they end up their Summer Camp.

Lol...there is no need of babysitting for me. We have mates and servants who can cook food, clean the house, wash the utensils and clothes etc and also to look after the kids.. and i can look after my work. Moreover having a driver is not a big deal either.

Nobody cares what Asian culture is or other cultures are when it comes to eligibility requirements.
Mainly own from husbands ?
And they should know that?
Who should've known ?

Why you remind me so many people asking questions at my work about showing under their name proof of address document on behalf of their wives and THE GET REFUSED.

Waw so you are enforcing the assumption that women are oppressed in Asian culture ?
Are they ?
If her father is sick and getting TRV aproval by applying only for her self is the best option, it is your time now to step forward and help her by babysitting your kids AND LET HER GO.

I think Canada is trying to avoid people who come here never working a day in their lives and tax payers paying for them through govt assistance. Kind of like your in laws.

Perfect solution, you have enough funds to take care of them for 20 years maybe you should do that instead of the Canadian govt....and as a bonus everyone could meet everyone.

 

[1122khan11]

lol they are just trying but not successful in that.. . because it has become the heaven for unwanted people and asylum seekers now. For every virus there is an antivirus.....And this is a big question mark on their sound judgement. Their local laws are such that they are encouraging the asylum seekers and on the other hand because of this they are making it tough for the genuine visitors for the visa.. This is an open contradiction... Secondly if you give someone an Asylum .. its good of the govt. on humanitarian grounds... But is this fair that their family members cant visit them...??? just because of this.... then why not Canada throw all the approved Asylum Seekers in far flung Island, Especially it don't suits to a country who claims so much of Family Orientation/ Reunification etc.

May be you have not read properly... my in laws are all working.(because about CAD 1100 allowance is peanut).... but people around 80 or if they are ill.and aged... whether they came through Asylum or Natural immigration, Govt. give assistance to them. So it does not make difference. Also ...then my question is that why they pay allowance for the kids, even to those who are well off and are doing good???? As far as burden on tax payers are concerned, if you are Canadian you must know that if you pay tax now, in the old age you will get more benefit as compared to those who have never worked....Please dont talk illogical . i know alll!!!!!!

Plus regarding tax is concerned it itself is a flaw in the system... im not responsible ....for that ... Taxes are already so high in Canada for businessmen and employees and everybody.

20 year funds are for my family not for them.... lol

I think Canada is trying to avoid people who come here never working a day in their lives and tax payers paying for them through govt assistance. Kind of like your in laws.

Perfect solution, you have enough funds to take care of them for 20 years maybe you should do that instead of the Canadian govt....and as a bonus everyone could meet everyone.

 

[Jets13]

lol they are just trying but not successful in that.. . because it has become the heaven for unwanted people and asylum seekers now. For every virus there is an antivirus.....And this is a big question mark on their sound judgement. Their local laws are such that they are encouraging the asylum seekers and on the other hand because of this they are making it tough for the genuine visitors for the visa.. This is an open contradiction... Secondly if you give someone an Asylum .. its good of the govt. on humanitarian grounds... But is this fair that their family members cant visit them...??? just because of this.... then why not Canada throw all the approved Asylum Seekers in far flung Island, Especially it don't suits to a country who claims so much of Family Orientation/ Reunification etc.

May be you have not read properly... my in laws are all working.(because about CAD 1100 allowance is peanut).... but people around 80 or if they are ill.and aged... whether they came through Asylum or Natural immigration, Govt. give assistance to them. So it does not make difference. Also ...then my question is that why they pay allowance for the kids, even to those who are well off and are doing good???? As far as burden on tax payers are concerned, if you are Canadian you must know that if you pay tax now, in the old age you will get more benefit as compared to those who have never worked....Please dont talk illogical . i know alll!!!!!!

Plus regarding tax is concerned it itself is a flaw in the system... im not responsible ....for that ... Taxes are already so high in Canada for businessmen and employees and everybody.

20 year funds are for my family not for them.... lol

As it has already been mentioned the ability to come to Canada is a privilege not a right. Canada can choose to let in or reject as they wish. People who fled a country as their lives were at risk and were given refuge in Canada when Canada did not have to do anything should not really be talking about a lack of "fairness". If it is so unfair perhaps they should return? Like I mentioned earlier....maybe Canada doesn't want their family members to visit on a VISITOR visa because they think they will also claim asylum on a visitor visa just like the rest of the family did.

You didn't respond to my suggestion......you have so much help.....maids....servants....decades worth of wealth...perhaps you should take care of your wife's parents. Pay for your father in laws health care instead of the taxpayers. As you said....that money and land is in your name....but it is equally hers right? So why doesn't she take care of her parents? They can be together as well.