Kindly find the two comments in the GCMS notes.
------------------
10.07.18 - Indian Nationals working for company in KSA, going to Canada. Have provided what appear to be altered versions of the same bank statement. Have changed dates, reference numbers and amounts, but series of transactions are roughly the same. Even transferred 100 SAR at the exact same second – PFL to be sent
29.07.18 - I had concerns about the authenticity of the bank statement provided by the PA in support of his application. The PA was given an opportunity to address these concerns by the way of PFl. PA’s response did not allay the concerns – he and his colleague provided the same responses, with new versions of the same bank statements showing some identical transactions. The misrepresentation of the material fact of bank balance and transaction history could have induced an error in the administration of the ACT by giving the incorrect impression that the applicant has sufficient funds for a trip to Canada, and that he is sufficiently well established in terms of financial status to return to KSA at the end of a trip to CDA. As such, applicant is found to be inadmissible for misrepresentation and the application is refused.
-----------------------------------
Me and my office collugue applied togther and there are a few transcations were i have trasferred money so he could pay our landlord the rent ( we are staying in the same building) ... but this was not to show any funds.. Also my current bank balance is healthier then what it was during the time i applied for visa.