Hi, the analysts usually play the role of filtration and would ideally forward the cases that are genuine or may seem genuine with a review required. There's no generalised method which they follow as there are cases where they demanded further relevant or supporting documentation and shot an ADR whereas in some cases it was a direct rejection.But what would be the line btw rate as ''review required'' or straight rejection by the case analyst?
For instance, if the case analyst thinks you picked the wrong NOC. He would put review required or reject?
Or a POF letter with not all details requested.
Cheers!
If theres a confusion on NOC, then eligibility can go either into review required or rejection depending upon the case and the intensity of the deviation.
If the analysis result from a case analyst is declared as 'incorrect NOC' despite ADR etc then it is rejection cuz thats what the visa officer would choose to comply with unless he/she finds a slip made by the analyst.
I suggest u to place an order for gcms notes and then u can get a clearer picture of ground reality and make necessary moves to tackle the situation. Did u contact the CIC client agent regarding ur eligibility status etc?