Better call your banks and do the proof properly with the 6 month average than sending 6 month statements for each bank, too much papers and data to look at. That can delay a lot your PPR!
March 2018 AOR - join here!
- Thread starter andy108
- Start date
Same here Bro, just keep posting about any development so we may keep ourselves motivated.Hey, same problem. I completed my 6 months on 25th September. Tried all you have mentioned and same thing. All they can tell is it is under process. Its frustrating.
AOR March 2nd, I also received the following response from the office of Ralph Goodale., MP and Minister of Public Safety, really no difference from the GCMS notes:
Dear Chrislain
I spoke to IRCC regarding your application received Mar 2, 2018. It is at the Case Processing Centre in Ottawa.
Standard processing time is 6 months. This means 80% of routine applications are completed within that time frame, while 20% take longer.
Eligibility is in process – recommend pass.
Criminality and security checks have not been initiated. They cannot be expedited and timelines are not available.
Medicals are valid until Feb 2019.
Sincerely,
Dear Chrislain
I spoke to IRCC regarding your application received Mar 2, 2018. It is at the Case Processing Centre in Ottawa.
Standard processing time is 6 months. This means 80% of routine applications are completed within that time frame, while 20% take longer.
Eligibility is in process – recommend pass.
Criminality and security checks have not been initiated. They cannot be expedited and timelines are not available.
Medicals are valid until Feb 2019.
Sincerely,
Hi Chris, I’m experiencing the same issue with the visa office, do assist with Ralph Goodale email address.
Sorry for the delay in replying. Here is his address: ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca but I think his intervention is not really helpful. anyway, you can try and see.
Posted this in June thread originally. But may be people here will find it useful. I think IRCC has missed the 80% mark for March and data shows that processing is slower post March.
%age statuses by month as per Immitracker. Based on my past experience on reaction to this post will start with following disclaimer points
%age statuses by month as per Immitracker. Based on my past experience on reaction to this post will start with following disclaimer points
- Yes the immitracker data may not be accurate, as not all people enter or update their data. But I think it is okay as in no field you can have absolute population data. You will have to work with sample data and make decisions.
- As you read this and the data and you feel "oh I could list N reasons the data is not the right sample" … well yeah I know that BUT unless someone can give better data, this is all we have. So let’s make peace with it.
- Immitracker ignores inactive cases. And yes it does impact %ages. However, I think immitracker is correct in ignoring inactive cases.
- I stand corrected on above. On 9th October there were a lot of cases which went inactive and hence were messing up the %age trends. I was not tracking active cases on regular basis as the numbers didn't change much. But to keep consistency I have now used active case number as on 21st Sep (as that is the only week I had captured number of active cases)
- Having said all of above, I think this data can still be used to see trends which are useful. The %ages may not be accurate but overall movement is definitely indicative of progress
- And lastly, if you disagree just ignore!
My AOR is March 14 2018. I was in Review Required for employment verification in April. I preemptively raised a CSE in May and sent additional documentation. On August 8 or 9 i went into "your background check is in progress'.
Still waiting on PPR. Agent I spoke to on Friday says everything looks good not to worry.
Just keeping hope alive.
This is very useful, thanks for sharing!Posted this in June thread originally. But may be people here will find it useful. I think IRCC has missed the 80% mark for March and data shows that processing is slower post March.
%age statuses by month as per Immitracker. Based on my past experience on reaction to this post will start with following disclaimer points
- Yes the immitracker data may not be accurate, as not all people enter or update their data. But I think it is okay as in no field you can have absolute population data. You will have to work with sample data and make decisions.
- As you read this and the data and you feel "oh I could list N reasons the data is not the right sample" … well yeah I know that BUT unless someone can give better data, this is all we have. So let’s make peace with it.
- Immitracker ignores inactive cases. And yes it does impact %ages. However, I think immitracker is correct in ignoring inactive cases.
- I stand corrected on above. On 9th October there were a lot of cases which went inactive and hence were messing up the %age trends. I was not tracking active cases on regular basis as the numbers didn't change much. But to keep consistency I have now used active case number as on 21st Sep (as that is the only week I had captured number of active cases)
- Having said all of above, I think this data can still be used to see trends which are useful. The %ages may not be accurate but overall movement is definitely indicative of progress
- And lastly, if you disagree just ignore!