I am using 14 months work experience to apply for PR.
My job had a condition: guaranteed for 6 months, followed by a review of performance and then extension for another 6 months if found satisfactory.
So I was given extensions twice, without any break in the job. Can it raise a question mark?
I was reading a case of refusal on MyImmiTracker where CIC was not satisfied that it was a continuous employment because the applicant mentioned about extensions.
The extension clause is clearly mentioned on my appointment letter. Should I skip submitting it as a supporting proof of work experience?
I have experience letter, salary slips and relieving letter as other supporting proofs.
My job had a condition: guaranteed for 6 months, followed by a review of performance and then extension for another 6 months if found satisfactory.
So I was given extensions twice, without any break in the job. Can it raise a question mark?
I was reading a case of refusal on MyImmiTracker where CIC was not satisfied that it was a continuous employment because the applicant mentioned about extensions.
The extension clause is clearly mentioned on my appointment letter. Should I skip submitting it as a supporting proof of work experience?
I have experience letter, salary slips and relieving letter as other supporting proofs.