Hi guys. We’re having a concern since our son was undeclared by my husband. Our expectation is that our application might got refuse due to misrepresentation.
But we just received our GCMS note, stating this on our initial review:
“Dependent (name of our son) was not declared. However, as the Principal Applicant is not an excluded family member and Dependent is not being sponsored themselves as members of the family class but rather as an accompanying dependent of a member of the family class, the Dependent is not inadmissible under R117(9)(d). Eligibility passed.”
Guys, what are your thoughts/understandings about this? Thank you in advance.
Just wondering why would she email CPC Ottawa about her child before landing?He still didn’t declared even on his landing interview.
You are lucky. Not sure your whole immigration story but looks like the omissions are being forgiven.Hi guys. We’re having a concern since our son was undeclared by my husband. Our expectation is that our application might got refuse due to misrepresentation.
But we just received our GCMS note, stating this on our initial review:
“Dependent (name of our son) was not declared. However, as the Principal Applicant is not an excluded family member and Dependent is not being sponsored themselves as members of the family class but rather as an accompanying dependent of a member of the family class, the Dependent is not inadmissible under R117(9)(d). Eligibility passed.”
Guys, what are your thoughts/understandings about this? Thank you in advance.
hello! we have the same situation. can you please help me? what did you do? dis you hire a lawyer? pls replyHi guys. We’re having a concern since our son was undeclared by my husband. Our expectation is that our application might got refuse due to misrepresentation.
But we just received our GCMS note, stating this on our initial review:
“Dependent (name of our son) was not declared. However, as the Principal Applicant is not an excluded family member and Dependent is not being sponsored themselves as members of the family class but rather as an accompanying dependent of a member of the family class, the Dependent is not inadmissible under R117(9)(d). Eligibility passed.”
Guys, what are your thoughts/understandings about this? Thank you in advance.
This is directly from the OP2 manual: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/op/op02-eng.pdfHi guys. We’re having a concern since our son was undeclared by my husband. Our expectation is that our application might got refuse due to misrepresentation.
But we just received our GCMS note, stating this on our initial review:
“Dependent (name of our son) was not declared. However, as the Principal Applicant is not an excluded family member and Dependent is not being sponsored themselves as members of the family class but rather as an accompanying dependent of a member of the family class, the Dependent is not inadmissible under R117(9)(d). Eligibility passed.”
Guys, what are your thoughts/understandings about this? Thank you in advance.
You will need to explain what exactly your situation is, to get any useful advice here. So on who's app was the child undeclared, how are you trying to sponsor them now, etc.hello! we have the same situation. can you please help me? what did you do? dis you hire a lawyer? pls reply
It is so clear from the OP Manual ...if you sponsoring your wife your undeclared son or daughter will be admissible as an accompanying family of the applicant ...but if you will sponsor the child he or she is inadmissiblehello! we have the same situation. can you please help me? what did you do? dis you hire a lawyer? pls reply
Need to be very careful here, as while the child is not inadmissible if a dependent in another person's app, it does not negate the fact there was misrepresentation done in the original PR app.It is so clear from the OP Manual ...if you sponsoring your wife your undeclared son or daughter will be admissible as an accompanying family of the applicant ...but if you will sponsor the child he or she is inadmissible
hi! i was a dependent child during my mother's pr application. and within the process i got pregnant. my mother didn't know she need to declare my daughter because she has no idea what to do. she told me i can sponsor my child once i arrive and have a job. also,i went home and i married the father of my child. it was devastating to know i cannot ever sponsor my own daughter just because my mother did not know anything with regards to declaration. And I as a dependent child trusted my mother and I just listen to whatever she says because i dont also know the law. please help meeeYou will need to explain what exactly your situation is, to get any useful advice here. So on who's app was the child undeclared, how are you trying to sponsor them now, etc.
So I assume your daughter was born before you landed as PR?hi! i was a dependent child during my mother's pr application. and within the process i got pregnant. my mother didn't know she need to declare my daughter because she has no idea what to do. she told me i can sponsor my child once i arrive and have a job. also,i went home and i married the father of my child. it was devastating to know i cannot ever sponsor my own daughter just because my mother did not know anything with regards to declaration. And I as a dependent child trusted my mother and I just listen to whatever she says because i dont also know the law. please help meee
yes,she was born before i landed in canada. no,we did not live together with the father because my mom told me not to and because of the nature of his job to be assigned away. he seldom sees our daughter too. i married him after i landed in canada.i went home to marry him because my daughter's surname was his.So I assume your daughter was born before you landed as PR?
Also did you get married with the father, before or after you became a PR?'
And at any time before you landed as a PR, had you lived with the father for at least 12 months?
As you probably know, your daughter is ineligible to be sponsored since she was not declared in your own PR application. Luckily since you got married after you landed as PR and were never common-law before that, you are fully eligible to sponsor your husband.yes,she was born before i landed in canada. no,we did not live together with the father because my mom told me not to and because of the nature of his job to be assigned away. he seldom sees our daughter too. i married him after i landed in canada.i went home to marry him because my daughter's surname was his.
As I said I"m not too familiar with this rule and haven't seen any real life situations of it being applied except in this very thread. But based on how it's written, it sounds like it would fit your situation.is that a new rule? someone told me before i cannot add my child even if i sponsor my husband. because immigration could trace it. well,i hope what you said is true. you gave me some light in my case.