Hello Everyone,
I have been a silent observer so-far and can’t thank you enough for spreading the optimism.
I think that we would never be able to understand everything that influences the size of draw. Only predictable bit, as of now, is the range-bound cut-off ( ~435), if the size of draw remains @ 2700 and with a frequency of once every fortnight. I am sorry to appear as trying to dampen the spirit, however following is my rationale for thinking so and I, appreciatively, seek responses from all of you to alter my POV, as I too want the cut-off to drop to 400-410 asap.
It takes 8-9 months to get a PR after receipt /acceptance of ITA - 3 months for application’s submission and 6 months for processing. If one adds another 4-6 months, afterwards, for the first landing, we have a gestation period of 12-15 months before an ITA contributes towards migration quota. Simply, an ITAs issued Sep’17 onwards would contribute mainly towards migration target of 2019. Therefore, its safe to assume that -
The quota for 2019 through Express Entry is 142400 landings (81400:FHS + 61000NP = 142400).
Assuming that 90% of ITAs are accepted by candidates, 90% of those applications are cleared by Canada government and each successful application equals 2.5 landings, the numbers of ITAs to be issued from Oct’17-Sep’18 should be in ballpark of 70K. And, if the frequency remains once per fortnight, average draw size would remain range bound i.e. 2500-2600.
Other Scenario (2) - If I were to relax my assumptions as 85%, 85% & 2.2 , the average draw size comes to 3200.
Other Scenario (2) - At assumptions of 80%, 80% & 2.2 , the average draw size could be 3600.
Question :- Does anyone have the data / understanding about what % of ITAs are accepted, what % of application get selected and average number of landings / PR?
Alternately, I might be missing something and these estimates reflect just my poor understanding. Would appreciate hearing your views and having a clearer opinion on what to expect in coming months.
Thanks,
I have been a silent observer so-far and can’t thank you enough for spreading the optimism.
I think that we would never be able to understand everything that influences the size of draw. Only predictable bit, as of now, is the range-bound cut-off ( ~435), if the size of draw remains @ 2700 and with a frequency of once every fortnight. I am sorry to appear as trying to dampen the spirit, however following is my rationale for thinking so and I, appreciatively, seek responses from all of you to alter my POV, as I too want the cut-off to drop to 400-410 asap.
It takes 8-9 months to get a PR after receipt /acceptance of ITA - 3 months for application’s submission and 6 months for processing. If one adds another 4-6 months, afterwards, for the first landing, we have a gestation period of 12-15 months before an ITA contributes towards migration quota. Simply, an ITAs issued Sep’17 onwards would contribute mainly towards migration target of 2019. Therefore, its safe to assume that -
- ITAs for 2018 quotas have been issued already , by/before Sep'17
- Draw sizes during Q4’17 to Q3’18 will be designed with a view to achieve immigration targets of 2019
The quota for 2019 through Express Entry is 142400 landings (81400:FHS + 61000NP = 142400).
Assuming that 90% of ITAs are accepted by candidates, 90% of those applications are cleared by Canada government and each successful application equals 2.5 landings, the numbers of ITAs to be issued from Oct’17-Sep’18 should be in ballpark of 70K. And, if the frequency remains once per fortnight, average draw size would remain range bound i.e. 2500-2600.
Other Scenario (2) - If I were to relax my assumptions as 85%, 85% & 2.2 , the average draw size comes to 3200.
Other Scenario (2) - At assumptions of 80%, 80% & 2.2 , the average draw size could be 3600.
Question :- Does anyone have the data / understanding about what % of ITAs are accepted, what % of application get selected and average number of landings / PR?
Alternately, I might be missing something and these estimates reflect just my poor understanding. Would appreciate hearing your views and having a clearer opinion on what to expect in coming months.
Thanks,