There's a slight difference.
Many thanks for clarifying this. I knew not to get the "guarantor" bit, so she has definitely stamped them both correctly on their obverses (studio name & address, date photos taken, with a blank line for me to write my name on). So she's correct then, that apart from the stamped info on the back, that the new citizenship photo specifications in terms of physical size etc. are precisely the same for PRs applying for citizenship as they are for Canadians applying for a passport.
The guarantor at the back does not make it a wrong photo. At Costco, for example, they have one stamp with a guarantor at the back for all kinds of official photos. Let's say you signed it? Will they return the application to you? Hell No
Don't spread false information. When I spread a false one, I just delete my post because it might confuse the readers.
The only remaining uncertainty is whether the citizenship applicant's birth-date is required on the back of each photo as well as the name, or not?
Why is it even considered an uncertainty? there is not even one word about birth date on a citizenship picture anywhere in the citizenship forms...(only the date the picture was taken on)
Nope. The clerk assisting me told me that it might be needed on there as well as my full name, but I couldn't see anything anywhere about the birthdate, so one's snarkiness is misplaced in this instance.
lol no snarkiness over here
(just didn't have coffee yet)Is the official instruction guide as faultless as the new form or the advice one can glean from the CIC/IRCC call centre then?
