are you sure you were in IP2? Most probably you were in IP1 all that timeMy file was in IP2 and now it's NA. I didn't pay RPRF yet so I'm not sure what it means. Anyone got an idea?
I was sure too until I found out I wasn't. Can you clarify? After I moved to not applicable I got my RPRF request a few days later and went to "we are processing your background check"Yes I'm sure I was in IP2
So you never saw NA before? It could be. After all each case is differentI was IP1 then IP2 "we are processing your background check" then it changed to NA
Ya very weird, I'm worried I get a rejection email or something on MondaySo you never saw NA before? It could be. After all each case is different
Oh don't fret it. The IP1 - NA - IP2 - NA2 isn't always 100% accurate for everyone. Try to stay calm and positive (It's my advice for myself as well).Ya very weird, I'm worried I get a rejection email or something on Monday
@Nykro Dude, am currently in the same boat as you. My status changed fro . IP1 to IP2 on November 1st. Then yesterday (November 7), it change to NA. It looked weird to me because I know people normally move from IP2 to PPR.My file was in IP2 and now it's NA. I didn't pay RPRF yet so I'm not sure what it means. Anyone got an idea?
Just curious, where did you get this information?anybody who had prior canadian work experience will have the message "we are processing..." this is not ip2.
From applicants who experienced it, including myself. I am FSW-O but I had canadian work experience so my application also started as "we are processing" and now i am at NA2 waiting for IP2's message "we are processing.." again..Just curious, where did you get this information?
First time I hear about that. Are you in a position to confirm it is a general rule, or just based on a few examples?From applicants who experienced it, including myself. I am FSW-O but I had canadian work experience so my application also started as "we are processing" and now i am at NA2 waiting for IP2's message "we are processing.." again..
Nobody here is truly in position to confirm anything, its all speculations based on statistics and occurrences.First time I hear about that. Are you in a position to confirm it is a general rule, or just based on a few examples?