Hello everyone,
I’d like to apply for the citizenship by descent, but I’m wondering if I should or not - because of the 2009 amendments.
Sorry for the long post, I hope someone can clarify this for me – my case is described below:
My grandfather (born in 1915) was born and raised in Canada and immigrated to Brazil in the 40’s, where he met my grandmother (Brazilian), married and stayed there until his death.
My father was born in Brazil (1st generation born abroad) in 1948 but was registered as a Canadian citizen born abroad and thus was a Canadian citizen by birth.
Having lived in Brazil his whole life, my father lost his Canadian citizenship in his 28th birthday (in 1976), due to one of the old rules in the Canadian immigration act. He married my mom (Brazilian) and had me and my 2 brothers.
I was born in Brazil in 1986, and since my dad wasn’t a Canadian citizen anymore, I could not apply for the citizenship.
In 2009, however, the immigration act was amended and brought 2 new rules that changed the situation:
1st – people that had lost citizenship due to those old rules (like my dad) would have their citizenship restored retroactively to the day they lost it.
2nd – people that are 2nd generation born abroad are no longer citizens by descent.
So, after that, my first thought was: my father got his citizenship back (and he did) but I, as a second generation born abroad, have no right to be a Canadian by descent (bad news!)
But then, after reading some articles on the web and even some info on the cic website, I realized that maybe I still have the right to be a citizen by descent, but that would depend on how you interpret the law.
As far as my understanding of the law goes: even if you are a second generation born abroad, you have the right to the Canadian citizenship by descent (and are exempt from the new limitation) if you were born before 2009 and your Canadian parent was a citizen on the day of your birth.
That is when it gets tricky, because until 2009, my dad was not a citizen the day I was born. But, since the law restored his citizenship retroactively back to the day he lost it, I would assume that the period in time when he was not a citizen has been erased (in the eyes of the law), so that after 2009 my dad would have been a Canadian citizen his whole life without any interruptions whatsoever, thus now I can say that I am a second generation born abroad, but I was born before 2009 and my Canadian parent was indeed a citizen the day I was born.
Based on that reasoning, I should apply for the citizenship by descent, but since I am no law specialist I am not sure.
Does anyone have a deep/better understanding of the law in order to tell me if my reasoning is right or wrong? I keep asking myself if I am right or if I am missing something.
Thank you very much!!
I’d like to apply for the citizenship by descent, but I’m wondering if I should or not - because of the 2009 amendments.
Sorry for the long post, I hope someone can clarify this for me – my case is described below:
My grandfather (born in 1915) was born and raised in Canada and immigrated to Brazil in the 40’s, where he met my grandmother (Brazilian), married and stayed there until his death.
My father was born in Brazil (1st generation born abroad) in 1948 but was registered as a Canadian citizen born abroad and thus was a Canadian citizen by birth.
Having lived in Brazil his whole life, my father lost his Canadian citizenship in his 28th birthday (in 1976), due to one of the old rules in the Canadian immigration act. He married my mom (Brazilian) and had me and my 2 brothers.
I was born in Brazil in 1986, and since my dad wasn’t a Canadian citizen anymore, I could not apply for the citizenship.
In 2009, however, the immigration act was amended and brought 2 new rules that changed the situation:
1st – people that had lost citizenship due to those old rules (like my dad) would have their citizenship restored retroactively to the day they lost it.
2nd – people that are 2nd generation born abroad are no longer citizens by descent.
So, after that, my first thought was: my father got his citizenship back (and he did) but I, as a second generation born abroad, have no right to be a Canadian by descent (bad news!)
But then, after reading some articles on the web and even some info on the cic website, I realized that maybe I still have the right to be a citizen by descent, but that would depend on how you interpret the law.
As far as my understanding of the law goes: even if you are a second generation born abroad, you have the right to the Canadian citizenship by descent (and are exempt from the new limitation) if you were born before 2009 and your Canadian parent was a citizen on the day of your birth.
That is when it gets tricky, because until 2009, my dad was not a citizen the day I was born. But, since the law restored his citizenship retroactively back to the day he lost it, I would assume that the period in time when he was not a citizen has been erased (in the eyes of the law), so that after 2009 my dad would have been a Canadian citizen his whole life without any interruptions whatsoever, thus now I can say that I am a second generation born abroad, but I was born before 2009 and my Canadian parent was indeed a citizen the day I was born.
Based on that reasoning, I should apply for the citizenship by descent, but since I am no law specialist I am not sure.
Does anyone have a deep/better understanding of the law in order to tell me if my reasoning is right or wrong? I keep asking myself if I am right or if I am missing something.
Thank you very much!!