Hey...., It is a good day today for the French Stream!
Congratulation and all the best for the rest of the journey!
I wish you all luck with your application Damocles!
Hey...., It is a good day today for the French Stream!
Congratulation and all the best for the rest of the journey!
CongoFinally, PR approved. Details and timeline below.
CEC Inland. CRS 440. I had everything ready and submitted all docs including meds with the application.
01.25 - ITA received
01.30 - Application submitted
01.31 - AOR
03.14 - IP1
04.20 - GCMS notes request
05.03 - Meds passed
05.11 - GCMS notes received
05.15 - Additional doc. request
05.16 - Additional doc. submitted
05.28 - IP2
05.30 - PPR
05.31 - PP sent
06.02 - PP received in Ottawa
06.07 - PR approved
It's been a long wait but totally worth it. Good luck everybody!
congratulationsITA : 04/01
AOR : 11/01
VM : 07/02
NS - NA : 07/02
NA - NA : 01/03
NA - BGC : 05/06
PPR : 07/06 !
congratulationsHi,
PPR!
Timeline:
PNP Outland
AOR 20 Jan
Meds passed 17 Feb
BG in Feb: Not started
BG in March: Not applicable
BG change: We are processing background check: 03 June
PPR: 07 June
I wish you all a fast PPR!!
Same situation with me as well. BG became Ip on 22nd May and till date no email. Do you have any travel history as in forum many has advised that could be the reason for delay in issuing PPR ??We're in the same boat. Schedule A given on 12th May and BG became IP on 21st May - that's 18 days.
Which VO and stream?We're in the same boat. Schedule A given on 12th May and BG became IP on 21st May - that's 18 days.
Which VO and stream?Same situation with me as well. BG became Ip on 22nd May and till date no email. Do you have any travel history as in forum many has advised that could be the reason for delay in issuing PPR ??
Expect golden email any time now.Hi all
My BG changed to IP2 yesterday. Would this mean that egilibility is passed? What may cause rejection at this stage?
FSW-O
AOR January 16th
Med passed on 2nd Feb
BG IP1 - 4th Feb
BG NA - 9th Feb
BG IP2 - 6th June.
Many thanks in advance for responding.
GCMS dated 27th March text:
REVIEW TYPE: Support Service Agent APPLICATION: E000xxxx REGULATION: FSW I have reviewed this
application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. EXPRESS ENTRY - APPLICATION SENT FOR R10 REVIEW MIN Score: 472 - ITA Score: 488 PRINCIPAL APPLICANT APPLICATION PROMOTED: Existing UCI REVIEW NOTES FOR REPRESENTATIVE: NO Representation MEDICAL ATTACHED TO UCI: Yes RCMP Check Initiated CLIENT FEES: Paid PA HAS CANADIAN EDUCATION CREDENTIALS: No PA HAS ECA WITH ACCOMPANYING FOREIGN CREDENTIALS: Yes LANGUAGES: Principal Applicant: - English: IELTS - Received: Met Threshold and Verified - French: TEF -Received: Met Threshold and Verified DOCUMENTS SET FOR REVIEW: CLIENT INFORMATION EDUCATION PROOF OF FUNDS POLICE CERTIFICATES
*** AGENT REVIEW *** POLICE CERTIFICATES R10 OK All police certificates on application; following PC's NRT MAURITUS. Criminality Decision Passed. EDUCATION DOCUMENTS ECA report verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site. ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as 2 BACHELOR DEGREES. Credential is consistent with level of education claimed by PA under EE Eligibility. NOTE: REVIEW OF CRS POINTS REQUIRED AGE Applicant's age reviewed and no change from ITA to e-APR.
VO I M NOT SURE COULD BE NDVO and stream PNP OUTLANDWhich VO and stream?
What's your country of residence?Hi all
My BG changed to IP2 yesterday. Would this mean that egilibility is passed? What may cause rejection at this stage?
FSW-O
AOR January 16th
Med passed on 2nd Feb
BG IP1 - 4th Feb
BG NA - 9th Feb
BG IP2 - 6th June.
Many thanks in advance for responding.
GCMS dated 27th March text:
REVIEW TYPE: Support Service Agent APPLICATION: E000xxxx REGULATION: FSW I have reviewed this
application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. EXPRESS ENTRY - APPLICATION SENT FOR R10 REVIEW MIN Score: 472 - ITA Score: 488 PRINCIPAL APPLICANT APPLICATION PROMOTED: Existing UCI REVIEW NOTES FOR REPRESENTATIVE: NO Representation MEDICAL ATTACHED TO UCI: Yes RCMP Check Initiated CLIENT FEES: Paid PA HAS CANADIAN EDUCATION CREDENTIALS: No PA HAS ECA WITH ACCOMPANYING FOREIGN CREDENTIALS: Yes LANGUAGES: Principal Applicant: - English: IELTS - Received: Met Threshold and Verified - French: TEF -Received: Met Threshold and Verified DOCUMENTS SET FOR REVIEW: CLIENT INFORMATION EDUCATION PROOF OF FUNDS POLICE CERTIFICATES
*** AGENT REVIEW *** POLICE CERTIFICATES R10 OK All police certificates on application; following PC's NRT MAURITUS. Criminality Decision Passed. EDUCATION DOCUMENTS ECA report verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site. ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as 2 BACHELOR DEGREES. Credential is consistent with level of education claimed by PA under EE Eligibility. NOTE: REVIEW OF CRS POINTS REQUIRED AGE Applicant's age reviewed and no change from ITA to e-APR.
Why don't you call the VO London and Abu Dhabi to get their counsel on the matter? In case, you aren't able to reach them in coming days, I would send my passport to VO stated on your PPR letter. I don't think it would be a problem to send your passport with fedex from Pakistan.Hi, as i have asked earlier same thing, i have received PPR a week ago, in PPR the mentioned VO is abu dhabi, but right now i am in Pakistan, i came Pakistan few days ago before PPR landed. therefore, i sent the email that pls change the VO from Abu Dhabi to Islamabad, but i read PPR letter completely again, there is another option to courier the passports to Abu Dhabi through aramex service. It's been a week i haven't receive any response from London VO, so should i proceed to courier through aramex or wait their email?
firstly i am not sure whether passports can be couriered out of pakistan, secondly, if i courier, by the time documents reached there i m wondering London Visa Office might have changed it to Pakistan High commission.