understanding GCMS notes

[Hsalaheldeen]

may i know ur category and primary vo.

my VO is CPC-Ottawa and category FSW Outland, BG in progress since 14/6

 

[Kirkoven]

Hey guys,
I just received my third set of notes my AOR is 8 January 2016, last notes was Officers review which stated everything is passed but it states that Experience documents are reviewed but not verified, and the correspondance channel changed from MyCiC to online without requesting, all the security related pages has S15(1) except for one page which contains S16 (c) and it contains EDSC =0 and Associations =0.
Please help me in understanding why it is showing s 16 (c) as I read from previous posts that it means something is going serious
Thank you

Hi Salah,

I also have s.16(1)(c) on a couple of pages. this was shown in the current notes as well as the previous one.

But also, i am still waiting like You.

 

[Hammer]

Hi Salah,

I also have s.16(1)(c) on a couple of pages. this was shown in the current notes as well as the previous one.

But also, i am still waiting like You.

Inland applicnt or outland? ALso paper application or online?

 

[cul10004]

Hi, do you have any idea about S.22(1)(b) ?? (maybe due to implied status & WP extension?)
I see this on my last page of the first GCMS note.

inland OINP - AOR in mid June
GCMS generated in mid Aug


Eligibility, Criminality, Medical: Passed
Security, HIRV: Blank


Case analyst: PNP,CEC :I have verified this application under section 11.2 of the immigration and refugee protection act(IRPA) and make the following determination. recommendation: ***appears to meet requirements*** ready to finalize ___________(erased)________ PA:.................. In implied status - WP valid until: 2016-Jun-XX Additional notes: PA's WP EXT rec'd by OSC Jun XX ...............no adverse information ........ ................. duty & experience :met

Officer review: Eligibility: passed. assessed under CEC regulations as per R87.1(2) ............. experience met, duties met. PNP met. PA appears to have ability to become economically established. I am satisfied that PA meets eligibility under EE-M1 PV2

 

[lazybone]

Hi Salah,

I also have s.16(1)(c) on a couple of pages. this was shown in the current notes as well as the previous one.

But also, i am still waiting like You.

s.16c is pretty normal to see. don't get stressed out by that....what do your admissibilities say? (should be in the middle of your notes)

regarding activity 1-4...you are currently undergoing security..you wont find any useful info coz most of it is blanked out..

 

[Que Em]

Hey guys,
I just received my third set of notes my AOR is 8 January 2016, last notes was Officers review which stated everything is passed but it states that Experience documents are reviewed but not verified, and the correspondance channel changed from MyCiC to online without requesting, all the security related pages has S15(1) except for one page which contains S16 (c) and it contains EDSC =0 and Associations =0.
Please help me in understanding why it is showing s 16 (c) as I read from previous posts that it means something is going serious
Thank you

I guess the section which is hidden under s.16(1)(c) is ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES under the main headline 'ASSOCIATIONS'. In my notes, it looks like this;

ESDC

ESDC: 0

ASSOCIATIONS

APPLICATIONS & CASES

APPLICATIONS & CASES: 0















GROUPS

GROUPS: 0

If there's nothing here, it normally looks like this:

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES: 0

And if there's some information in this section, then it looks like this:

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES: 1
Created Date:
Created By:
Updated Date:
Updated By:
Org/Entity ID:
Name:
Type:
Sub Type:
Other Sub Type Descrip:
Contact Last Name:
Contact First Name:
Reason:
Other Reason Descrip:
Effective Date:
Expiry Date:
Disassoc Reason:
Other Disassoc Descrip:
Registration #:
Place of Registry:
Status: Active

And this above part (in red) is usually redacted. I found this information online. In my notes, it's blanked out as well.

It seems to be related to some sort of verification/check (e.g., employment/job verification). It can be about any organization/entity contacted/used by the IRCC in connection with an application.

 

[Hsalaheldeen]

s.16c is pretty normal to see. don't get stressed out by that....what do your admissibilities say? (should be in the middle of your notes)

regarding activity 1-4...you are currently undergoing security..you wont find any useful info coz most of it is blanked out..

I have first 25 activities are related to security for me and my spouse and showing s15(1) on the top right corner
Admissibilities state : Security 1 and 2 blanked out activities for both me and my spouse
Can u help with this please lazybone?
Thank you

 

[Hsalaheldeen]

I guess the section which is hidden under s.16(1)(c) is ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES under the main headline 'ASSOCIATIONS'. In my notes, it looks like this;

Thank you for clarification
I have s16(c) in this section and it is like ur notes in blue
Besides in my notes the officer states that" Satisfied with exp docs , The experience docs have been reviewed but not verified "
Is it possible that they are tryijg to contact my employer but they can not receive a reply due to the great time difference ?














GROUPS

GROUPS: 0[/color]

If there's nothing here, it normally looks like this:

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES: 0

And if there's some information in this section, then it looks like this:

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES: 1
Created Date:
Created By:
Updated Date:
Updated By:
Org/Entity ID:
Name:
Type:
Sub Type:
Other Sub Type Descrip:
Contact Last Name:
Contact First Name:
Reason:
Other Reason Descrip:
Effective Date:
Expiry Date:
Disassoc Reason:
Other Disassoc Descrip:
Registration #:
Place of Registry:
Status: Active

And this above part (in red) is usually redacted. I found this information online. In my notes, it's blanked out as well.

It seems to be related to some sort of verification (e.g., employment/job verification). It can be about any organization/entity contacted/used by the IRCC in connection with an application. IRCC maintains a regularly updated database of various organizations and entities with respective contact information, and it is made available to IRCC officers to check information submitted by the applicants against a standard list, like various designated learning institutes and their DLI numbers and other associated information, for example, or it might contain details about any given employer and/or an institution (or a third party source) with details about how and who should be contacted to verify any information and/or document etc.

The reason it is hidden/redacted from the notes is that IRCC wants to keep such information and its sources private. Also, the disclosure of such information might result in a harm or might be injurious to the involved parties or this sort of conduct. For applicants, there's nothing of concern here and no need to worry. Just hope that the organization/entity doesn't mess up with the information and/or the act itself (like relaying wrong information and/or causing an unnecessary delay or not providing any feedback at all).

 

[Kirkoven]

s.16c is pretty normal to see. don't get stressed out by that....what do your admissibilities say? (should be in the middle of your notes)

regarding activity 1-4...you are currently undergoing security..you wont find any useful info coz most of it is blanked out..

Hi lazybone and thank You, again, for your support and insights as usual.

Under Admissibilities, in my notes, it goes like this:

SECURITY

UCI #: My Wife's UCI
Family Name: My Wife's Family Name
Given Name: My Wife's Given Name
Type: Security

ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENTS: 0

SUB ACTIVITIES
SUB ACTIVITIES: 0

UCI #: My UCI
Family Name: My Family Name
Given Name: My Given Name
Type: Security

ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENTS: 0

SUB ACTIVITIES
SUB ACTIVITIES: 0

UCI #: My UCI
Family Name: My Family Name
Given Name: My Given Name
Type: Security Screening

INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTNERS
INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTNERS: 0

INSTRUCTIONS FROM PARTNERS
INSTRUCTIONS FROM PARTNERS: 0


HIRV
HIRV: 0


CRIMINALITY

Criminality is already passed for me as well as medicals and eligibility so don't think that there is a need to elaborate there.

What do You think? Can you figure out anything from this?

 

[lazybone]

Hi lazybone and thank You, again, for your support and insights as usual.

Under Admissibilities, in my notes, it goes like this:

SECURITY ---------------------> does it give a number here?

UCI #: My Wife's UCI
Family Name: My Wife's Family Name
Given Name: My Wife's Given Name
Type: Security

ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENTS: 0

SUB ACTIVITIES
SUB ACTIVITIES: 0

UCI #: My UCI
Family Name: My Family Name
Given Name: My Given Name
Type: Security

ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENTS: 0

SUB ACTIVITIES
SUB ACTIVITIES: 0

UCI #: My UCI
Family Name: My Family Name
Given Name: My Given Name
Type: Security Screening

INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTNERS
INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTNERS: 0

INSTRUCTIONS FROM PARTNERS
INSTRUCTIONS FROM PARTNERS: 0


HIRV
HIRV: 0


CRIMINALITY

Criminality is already passed for me as well as medicals and eligibility so don't think that there is a need to elaborate there.

What do You think? Can you figure out anything from this?

 

[Kirkoven]

Yes, there is s.15(1) on all security pages of Admissibilities.

 

[Que Em]

[quote author=Hsalaheldeen]
Thank you for clarification
I have s16(c) in this section and it is like ur notes in blue
Besides in my notes the officer states that" Satisfied with exp docs , The experience docs have been reviewed but not verified "
Is it possible that they are tryijg to contact my employer but they can not receive a reply due to the great time difference ?

[/quote]

I don't think geographic time difference would be a hurdle, as IRCC can involve an officer from a local visa office or someone from your country of residence/employment. IRCC has its sources and means. Also, it can be done via email, fax or a letter. I don't think you have to worry about anything.

However, depending on your employer and the nature of your work, it can be of benefit if you can request your employer to respond to any verification request in a timely manner, 'if possible'.

 

[canadianrrk]

I guess the section which is hidden under s.16(1)(c) is ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES under the main headline 'ASSOCIATIONS'. In my notes, it looks like this;

ESDC

ESDC: 0

ASSOCIATIONS

APPLICATIONS & CASES

APPLICATIONS & CASES: 0















GROUPS

GROUPS: 0

If there's nothing here, it normally looks like this:

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES: 0

And if there's some information in this section, then it looks like this:

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES

ORGANIZATIONS & ENTITIES: 1
Created Date:
Created By:
Updated Date:
Updated By:
Org/Entity ID:
Name:
Type:
Sub Type:
Other Sub Type Descrip:
Contact Last Name:
Contact First Name:
Reason:
Other Reason Descrip:
Effective Date:
Expiry Date:
Disassoc Reason:
Other Disassoc Descrip:
Registration #:
Place of Registry:
Status: Active

And this above part (in red) is usually redacted. I found this information online. In my notes, it's blanked out as well.

It seems to be related to some sort of verification (e.g., employment/job verification). It can be about any organization/entity contacted/used by the IRCC in connection with an application. IRCC maintains a regularly updated database of various organizations and entities with respective contact information, and it is made available to IRCC officers to check information submitted by the applicants against a standard list, like various designated learning institutes and their DLI numbers and other associated information, for example, or it might contain details about any given employer and/or an institution (or a third party source) with details about how and who should be contacted to verify any information and/or document etc.

The reason it is hidden/redacted from the notes is that IRCC wants to keep such information and its sources private. Also, the disclosure of such information might result in a harm or might be injurious to the involved parties or this sort of conduct. For applicants, there's nothing of concern here and no need to worry. Just hope that the organization/entity doesn't mess up with the information and/or the act itself (like relaying wrong information and/or causing an unnecessary delay or not providing any feedback at all).

i have this s16.1.c blank .......i have groups and associations 0........i dont have organisations and entities..........are they orgs that check if our education is genuine and all?

 

[Hsalaheldeen]

hey lazybone
I have the same notes as these
The admissibility shows
Security : 1
------
Fir my spouse and
Security :2 for me


Thank you

 

[joyaman]

Updated Date: 2016/06/15 03:45:42 Updated By: C256
Restricted: No Label: General
Office: Centralized Intake Office Text:
REVIEW TYPE: Support Service Agent APPLICATION: XXXXXXXX REGULATION: PNP I have reviewed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. EXPRESS ENTRY - APPLICATION SENT FOR R10 REVIEW MIN Score: 484 - ITA Score: 960 PRINCIPAL APPLICANT APPLICATION PROMOTED: New UCI Created SPOUSE/CL APPLICATION PROMOTED:
New UCI Created DEPENDENT 1 (lshveer Singh, ) APPLICATION PROMOTED: New UCI Created REVIEW NOTES FOR REPRESENTATIVE: NO Representation MEDICAL ATTACHED TO UCI: Yes CLIENT FEES: Paid APPLICANT
HAS CANADIAN DEPENDENT(S): No LANGUAGES: Principal Applicant: - English: IELTS - Received: Met Threshold and Verified Spouse/Common Law: - English: IELTS - Received: Verified DOCUMENTS SET FOR REVIEW: POLICE CERTIFICATES EDUCATION PROOF OF FUNDS CLIENT INFORMATION-SCHEDULE 4

NOTES: 20
Created Date: 2016/06/16 01:22:49 Created By: xxxxx
Updated Date: 2016/06/16 01:22:49 Updated By: xxxxxxx
Restricted: No Label: General
Office: Centralized Intake Office
Text: Request letter for Schedule A sent via My CIC.

NOTES: 21
Created Date: 2016/06/17 01:45:32 Created By: xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Updated Date: 2016/06/17 01:46:29 Updated By: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Restricted: No Label: EE Eligibility
Office: Centralized Intake Office Text:
“ AGENT REVIEW * POLICE CERTIFICATES R10 OK All police certificates on application; following PC's NRT India. Criminality Decision Passed. EDUCATION DOCUMENTS ECA report verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site. ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Bachelor's degree Please review if Credential is consistent with level of education claimed by PA under EE Eligibility. Please Note: review required for CRS points SPOUSE'S EDUCATION NO ECA OR CANADIAN CREDENTIAL PROVIDED. AGE Applicant's age reviewed and HAS change from ITA to e-APR. Schedule a received and reviewed edoc 1012456

NOTES: 22
Created Date: 2016/06/18 12:14:44 Created By: xxxxx
Updated Date: 2016/06/18 12:14:44 Updated By: xxxxx
Restricted: No Label: General Office: CPC-Ottawa Text:



REVIEW TYPE: Program Assistant APPLICATION: xxxxxxx REGULATION: PNP, 2016-06-09 I have reviewed
this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. RECOMMENDATION: MEDICAL: ALL VALID Outstanding Documents (Requested): - RPRF PNP Triage: Refer to IR CIVIL STATUS: NO CONCERNS PA (XXXXX, ), MARRIED Marriage certificate is on file PASSPORT EXPIRY: 2024-03-17 SPOUSE/CL (XXXXX, ), ACCOMPANYING PASSPORT EXPIRY: 2025-01-12 DEP 1 (XXXXX, ,
born: 2013-01-31, age at lock-in date: 3), ACCOMPANYING Birth cert.: PA and Spouse/CL listed as parents PASSPORT EXPIRY: 2020-01-12 PNP
NOMINATION: - Province of Nomination: Saskatchewan. - PNC#: Non-Employer Driven - xxxxx. - Nomination validity: Original. - Case Type: Economic Case. - Schedule 4 on file: Yes. - Funds $: 23,000.00
INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): PA
(XXXXX, ) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present application SPOUSE/CL (XXXXX, ) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present application DEP 1 (XXXXX, ) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present application

NOTES: 23
Created Date: 2016/06/21 02:37:21 Created By: xxxxxx
Updated Date: 2016/06/21 02:37:21 Updated By: xxxxxx
Restricted: No Label: EE Eligibility Office: CPC-Ottawa Text:
REVIEW TYPE: Case Analyst APPLICATION: xxxxxxxxxxxxx REGULATION: PNP: FSW, 2016-06-09 I have verified
this application under Section 11.2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and make the following determination. RECOMMENDATION:"*Appears to meet requirements”” CIVIL STATUS: PA (xxxxxx), MARRIED SPOUSE/CL (xxxxxxx, ) DEP 1 (xxxxxx, , ACCOMPANYING
INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): PA
(xxxxxxxxxxxx, ) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present application SPOUSE/CL (xxxxxxxxxxx, ) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present application DEP 1 (xxxxxxxxx, ) No trace in GCMS/FOSS other than present application WORK EXPERIENCE(S): Qualifying Period: from 09JUN2006 to 08JUN2016 1) Analyst - (NOCxxxxxxxxxx) Feb 6, 2009 - Present at Office of Public xxxxxxxxxxxx LOE Salary $ : . Submitted letter(s) of reference April 20, 2016 which is/are assessed as follows: The duties listed in the letter(s) of reference appear to be consistent with the actions in the lead statement under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference appear to be consistent with a
substantial number of the main duties under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference appear to demonstrate that the PA met the minimum requirements of 12 months of work experience.


Can anybody help me to understand the same.

I have not claimed any point for my spouse education ( Put “No” in ECA in express entry ). I have did Bsc(03 yr)+Msc(02 Year) = wes is 04 year bachelor’s degree and one year graduate study ( I have selected Two or more certificates, diplomas, or degrees.)

Kindly confirm what to do next , can I raise the case , but I have already mentioned in LOE about my spouse education .