nope said:
MPs are able to look into some things, that's one of the reasons they exist and perform constituent services.
Precisely the point of my last post: the OP is NOT a constituent, he's a foreign national. Constituent implies you're eligible to vote and have a voice in the government. Perhaps you need a dictionary.
nope said:
If the OP is living in Canada, then they do have an MP, even if they aren't able to vote or reside permanently.
No, he does not. The riding where he lives has an MP. Not the OP himself. As far as the OP is concerned this is a foreign government and its officials have no obligation whatsoever to look out for his interests.
nope said:
I used to live in an American territory, a lawyer friend of mine had a foreign wife (no green card, because the territory controlled their own immigration, so she had an immigration status unique to that place). He got a job working for the State, and suddenly she had a US passport. There is no process, that I'm aware of, for becoming a US citizen without having a green card first. It's called 'knowing the guy'.
Another "friend of mine" story, which is just today's version of "once upon a time" 19th century fairy tales from a supernatural world. I have yet to see any of these stories confirmed first-hand by the original source.
That's what makes these tales just a story, and nothing more than that. People who tell them don't know all the facts about the original source (if such a person was ever real in the first place). Instead, the story only has the wishful thinking the audience wants to hear.
I don't know of any back door to qualifying for US immigration or citizenship benefits. I do know that when a US Senator feels a foreigner should get PR outside of the usual legal paths, then that Senator would have to introduce a bill in Congress that would allow the government to grant PR to this person.
These are called "private relief" bills, i.e. bills for the benefit of just one specific person or group of people. However, even for this there are rules. A private relief bill can only be introduced if the sponsoring Senator can demonstrate to the Senate that granting the foreigner PR is in the
national interest. The Senator would have to specify what the national interest is and would have to convince the Senate as a whole to pass the bill. These bills are small and are usually attached to larger bills but the national interest requirement is there.
I suppose any country would have some way to grant a foreigner a benefit if it's in the national interest. I'm dying to see what specific national interest would be served by granting the OP what he wants outside of the regular channels. That is, what interest would be served that isn't normally served by others in the same circumstances as the OP?
If you can't answer that, then it's the same as always: "I want what I want , and I want it now. Damn everything and everybody else."
And that is, ... to put it mildly, a large pile of insult.