Redacted GCMS page section 22(1)(b)

[mtc1992]

a whole page is redacted for section 22(1)(b), does anyone know what this is? I've never seen it before and can't find much info.

 

[luv2read90]

Well... Redaction is a form of editing in which multiple source texts are combined (redacted) and altered slightly to make a single document. Often this is a method of collecting a series of writings on a similar theme and creating a definitive and coherent work. (Courtesy of Google.)

So I wouldn't worry too much, they only summarized or consolidated a few pages that were giving basically the same or similar information.

 

[mtc1992]

Well... Redaction is a form of editing in which multiple source texts are combined (redacted) and altered slightly to make a single document. Often this is a method of collecting a series of writings on a similar theme and creating a definitive and coherent work. (Courtesy of Google.)

So I wouldn't worry too much, they only summarized or consolidated a few pages that were giving basically the same or similar information.

Well... I found the act on google, it is redacted due to keeping a "lawful investigation" secret. Except I have no criminal record and haven't done anything criminal in Canada or my home country. I'm concerned because I've never seen this mentioned for anyone before.

 

[luv2read90]

Well... I found the act on google, it is redacted due to keeping a "lawful investigation" secret. Except I have no criminal record and haven't done anything criminal in Canada or my home country. I'm concerned because I've never seen this mentioned for anyone before.

There's an act about redaction? But you are referring to a page in your GCMS notes... I'll look it up. If you didn't do anything you have absolutely nothing to worry about.

 

[mtc1992]

It's a subsection of the act that allows for them to withhold information if it would hurt a lawful investigation. It's very vague :/

It's a page of my GCMS notes that is withheld and their reasoning is that subsection

 

[luv2read90]

Okay... did a tiny bit of research. It appears to be some extra checks that CIC themselves undertake and if you haven't done anything wrong you have nothing to worry about. Quite a few people received a redaction in their GCMS notes and they went on to get PPR.

It could be a form of quality control. Look at this thread: http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/gcms-notes-and-the-curious-case-of-section-s-16-1-c.383143/

 

[Rahil Khan]

It's a subsection of the act that allows for them to withhold information if it would hurt a lawful investigation. It's very vague :/

It's a page of my GCMS notes that is withheld and their reasoning is that subsection

Hello i need help
Applied:2nd June Under SDS study visa
Biometric:5th June and updated
Medical:7th June
Eligibility:In Progress
Background.C:In Progress
Last two pages of GCMS shows S22(1)(b) same as yours...Did u get response how much time did it take i have been waiting from almost 5Months

 

[Naturgrl]

Hello i need help
Applied:2nd June Under SDS study visa
Biometric:5th June and updated
Medical:7th June
Eligibility:In Progress
Background.C:In Progress
Last two pages of GCMS shows S22(1)(b) same as yours...Did u get response how much time did it take i have been waiting from almost 5Months

Post is 6 years old is about Express Entry but read the OP’s old posts.