Thanks for all the information. Sorry if I'm contradicting you here, but I was recently working closely with the office of an MP in the Okanagan region, and they informed me that if I send my application for Permanent Residency in, 30 days before my IEC expiry date, I will indeed be granted implied status, allowing me to continue to work.Sweden said:And to confirm what another poster has already said - because your visa is an IEC, it's not extendable, and thus the "implied status" with inland doesn't give you the right to keep on working.
So - I would advise you to apply outland through London, even if you're in Canada. It's faster, and it also allows you to go in and out of Canada if needed. The only reason for you to apply inland would be to keep on working but it doesn't apply in your case.
So - yes, apply outland, and you won't get implied status. But send 30 days before the expiry of your current IEC visa a request to change your status from IEC to visitor. once your IEC is over, stop working (unless the LMO comes through obviously), and wait... not fun, but not much else to do! then you're on visitor status until your PR comes through. Stage 1 is currently 1 month, and applications through London take somewhere between 4 months (as a minimum these days it seems!), for straightforward, complete applications, to ... more! so it should be too bad.
Good luck,
Sweden
Do you feel I've maybe been misinformed?
The reason I chose inland is because my life is here now, my wife & job. Because I have an LMO sent in as backup, I figure the longer inland processing time for PR isn't too much of an issue to me, provided I get implied status.
The fact I could travel in/out of Canada on outland application isn't too much of an advantage to me as I have no plans to leave in the near future. Plus I've also heard with outland, you may have to fly to London for interview if you are requested to do so.
Cheers,
James