wowsers said:
Are you seriously suggesting that in Canada it is possible for a petitioner to obtain a divorce lawfully without the Respondent receiving any notice of the proceedings? Without being given any opportunity to defend the divorce proceedings if he so wishes? Consent to the proceedings is of course unnecessary, but absence of notice, particularly where the Petitioner knows where the Respondent lives (she wrote to him), usually entails fraud. Usually diivorce proceedings have to be served either in person or by post or a court order for substituted service, such as by advertisement, has to be obtained; and those orders are not usually made unless the court has been told that the whereabouts of the Respondent are unknown. If the court was so told despite the wife's knowledge of his whereabouts, there was probably fraud. Of course things may be different in Canada! I am not in Canada and am not a Canadian lawyer. Anyway are you not jumping the gun? We do not know for certain whether he was married, let alone divorced; but if he was divorced without his knowledge that would be a very unusual state of affairs in respect of which he would, to answer Truesmile's point, need legal advice. On the basis of the facts as at present known there are no grounds for asserting that if there was a divorce it would be completely legal in Canada. If he was once married and is not lawfully divorced, an assertion of bigamy as a means of getting her back to the Philippines is a possibility that springs to mind. How to bring her back is what he was asking about As for Truesmile's point about money, of course he wants money: he has the burden of caring for their children and receives no contribution from their mother. Wny is an attempt to get her to contribute not a laudable motive? I am astonished how little sympathy the man has received in this thread.
In this case, he knew she wanted to divorce him. If she could prove to the court that she contacted him and he refused to cooperate (which he already admitted he did), she could have gone ahead with the divorce proceedings without any more involvement from him. Canada does not force people to remain married if one spouse refuses to co-operate in the divorce or cannot be located. He would not have known if and when the divorce was approved.
People can be divorced completely without their knowledge. My cousin's husband left her and their 2 kids around 10 years ago; no one knew where he went, though we were all pretty sure his mother did and was just lying. It took my cousin awhile but she was able to divorce him in the end without his knowledge, as no one could even find him. After she married her current partner, they started legal proceedings for him to adopt her children, a long and expensive process. I believe the father's parental rights were terminated on the basis of the abandonment, which allowed the stepfather to adopt them. The bio father tried to make contact last year after 9-10 years absence and was quite surprised to find he wasn't married and had no rights to the kids any more. He tried to cause trouble, demanded money, threatened to go to court and fight it all. In the end, I guess he realized that they had done everything legal and he couldn't fight it; it also helped the kids were teens by then and able to say themselves that they wanted no contact with him.
As for jumping the gun, did you not jump the gun yourself, saying she was possibly a bigamist? And if you have a read through his post, nowhere does he say "her kids" or "our kids", only "my kids"; you are assuming that they are her children but it's also possible they were her stepchildren.
The facts known at present are all we are going to know, as they will only come from the OP's point of view. We know she told him she was trying to divorce him and he refused to co-operate; that is enough for her to have been able to legally divorce him without his consent or further involvement. Once legally divorced here in Canada, she could have then legally remarried. She would be a bigamist only in the Philippines, not in Canada, so OP could not use that in any way to force her to return to his country.