- Dec 7, 2009
- 10
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Ottawa
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 01-10-2010 CSQ Application
- Nomination.....
- 12-02-2012 CSQ Granted
- AOR Received.
- 14-05-2012
- Med's Request
- 14-05-2012
- Med's Done....
- 22-05-2012
- Passport Req..
- 10/08/2013
- VISA ISSUED...
- 11/08/2013
- LANDED..........
- 11/08/2013
Hi,
I'm not really asking a question here, I'm looking for opinions on the citizenship requirement which says "you cannot meet the residence requirements for citizenship without a minimum of two (2) years as a permanent resident".
Here's a brief summary of my background. Came to Canada in August 2009, began working as a Software Developer in Oct 2009. I'm still in that same job. Decided to apply for Quebec Skilled worked so submitted CSQ application in Oct 2010, CSQ Granted in Feb 2012, PR app submitted a week later, PR app received Feb 22nd. Next communication expected in May.
So at the earliest it will have taken me 32 months to get Permanent Residency, by which point I'll have been resident in Canada for 45 months, in permanent employment paying full taxes. What do people think the reason is that CIC want me to wait a further 24 months before they'll let me apply for Citizenship? Also given the 2 years it takes to process citizenship I will have been waiting on processing at various stages for a total of 7 years before I become a citizen. Now that means I'll have paid around $140,000 in income tax before I'm a citizen, and I'll have had no say over how that money is spent because I don't have a vote.
I am obviously annoyed that some people are able to get PR in a period of 12 months or less, and if I was one of them I'd be just about eligible for Citizenship now. I think a fairer system would be if they counted your time as a PR from when your application was received (either at CIC or Immigration Quebec for those who require a CSQ), assuming your application was successful of course and you were living and working in Canada while your application was being processed.
So as I say, this isn't a question, I know the rules of the system, I just want to know how other people feel about this and whether they agree it's unjust or they think it's a good rule, and why.
Thanks
I'm not really asking a question here, I'm looking for opinions on the citizenship requirement which says "you cannot meet the residence requirements for citizenship without a minimum of two (2) years as a permanent resident".
Here's a brief summary of my background. Came to Canada in August 2009, began working as a Software Developer in Oct 2009. I'm still in that same job. Decided to apply for Quebec Skilled worked so submitted CSQ application in Oct 2010, CSQ Granted in Feb 2012, PR app submitted a week later, PR app received Feb 22nd. Next communication expected in May.
So at the earliest it will have taken me 32 months to get Permanent Residency, by which point I'll have been resident in Canada for 45 months, in permanent employment paying full taxes. What do people think the reason is that CIC want me to wait a further 24 months before they'll let me apply for Citizenship? Also given the 2 years it takes to process citizenship I will have been waiting on processing at various stages for a total of 7 years before I become a citizen. Now that means I'll have paid around $140,000 in income tax before I'm a citizen, and I'll have had no say over how that money is spent because I don't have a vote.
I am obviously annoyed that some people are able to get PR in a period of 12 months or less, and if I was one of them I'd be just about eligible for Citizenship now. I think a fairer system would be if they counted your time as a PR from when your application was received (either at CIC or Immigration Quebec for those who require a CSQ), assuming your application was successful of course and you were living and working in Canada while your application was being processed.
So as I say, this isn't a question, I know the rules of the system, I just want to know how other people feel about this and whether they agree it's unjust or they think it's a good rule, and why.
Thanks