Dears;
Please be informed that I apply for immigration visa under skilled worker category(Computer Sys.Implementation Mnager on 2010), I received below rejection letter(the letter date is 27/4/3012),(many thanks in advanced) I need your help to explain why I did not award points for my spouse education and relative in Canada 5 points based on what mentioned in letter inspite of I send the copy of my wife diploma in computer programing and I send all required papers from my sister, what can I write to the officer to review my application? waiting your answer please
You have obtained insufficient points to qualify for immigration to Canada, the minimum requirement being 67 points. You were awarded 10 points for age. You were awarded 20 points for education. You were awarded 21 points for experience. You were not awarded points for arranged employment, as you have no such arrangement. You were awarded 9 points for English language ability as per your IELTS results. You did not indicate proficiency in French. Although you indicated that your spouse completed a , two-year post-secondary educational credential, you failed to provide sufficient evidence that this program of study or training was completed at an educational or training institution recognized by the authorities responsible for registering, accrediting, supervising and regulating such institutions in the country of issue. As such, no points have been awarded for your spouse’s education. Although you indicated that you have a relation in Canada, you failed to provide sufficient evidence as to the relationship of yourself and your relation in Canada. As such, no points have been awarded for a relation in Canada. No other adaptability factors applied in your case. Therefore, your point total is: 60. You have not obtained sufficient points to satisfy me that you will be able to become economically established in Canada.
Subsection 76(3) of the IRPA Regulations permits an officer to substitute their evaluation of the likelihood to become economically established in Canada if the number of points awarded is not a sufficient indicator of whether the skilled worker may become economically established in Canada. Subsection 76(4) states that such an evaluation requires the concurrence of a second officer. I have considered your case under this section. I have determined that the points that you have been awarded are an accurate reflection of the likelihood of your ability to become economically established in Canada. As a result, I did not forward your application to the program manager for consideration.
Subsection 11(1) of the Act states that a foreign national must, before entering Canada, apply to an officer for a visa or for any other document required by the regulations. The visa or document may be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of this Act. Subsection 2(1) specifies that unless otherwise indicated, references in the Act to “this Act” include regulations made under it.
Following an examination of your application, I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of the Act and the Regulations for the reasons explained above. I am therefore refusing your application.
Thank you for the interest you have shown in Canada
Please be informed that I apply for immigration visa under skilled worker category(Computer Sys.Implementation Mnager on 2010), I received below rejection letter(the letter date is 27/4/3012),(many thanks in advanced) I need your help to explain why I did not award points for my spouse education and relative in Canada 5 points based on what mentioned in letter inspite of I send the copy of my wife diploma in computer programing and I send all required papers from my sister, what can I write to the officer to review my application? waiting your answer please
You have obtained insufficient points to qualify for immigration to Canada, the minimum requirement being 67 points. You were awarded 10 points for age. You were awarded 20 points for education. You were awarded 21 points for experience. You were not awarded points for arranged employment, as you have no such arrangement. You were awarded 9 points for English language ability as per your IELTS results. You did not indicate proficiency in French. Although you indicated that your spouse completed a , two-year post-secondary educational credential, you failed to provide sufficient evidence that this program of study or training was completed at an educational or training institution recognized by the authorities responsible for registering, accrediting, supervising and regulating such institutions in the country of issue. As such, no points have been awarded for your spouse’s education. Although you indicated that you have a relation in Canada, you failed to provide sufficient evidence as to the relationship of yourself and your relation in Canada. As such, no points have been awarded for a relation in Canada. No other adaptability factors applied in your case. Therefore, your point total is: 60. You have not obtained sufficient points to satisfy me that you will be able to become economically established in Canada.
Subsection 76(3) of the IRPA Regulations permits an officer to substitute their evaluation of the likelihood to become economically established in Canada if the number of points awarded is not a sufficient indicator of whether the skilled worker may become economically established in Canada. Subsection 76(4) states that such an evaluation requires the concurrence of a second officer. I have considered your case under this section. I have determined that the points that you have been awarded are an accurate reflection of the likelihood of your ability to become economically established in Canada. As a result, I did not forward your application to the program manager for consideration.
Subsection 11(1) of the Act states that a foreign national must, before entering Canada, apply to an officer for a visa or for any other document required by the regulations. The visa or document may be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of this Act. Subsection 2(1) specifies that unless otherwise indicated, references in the Act to “this Act” include regulations made under it.
Following an examination of your application, I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of the Act and the Regulations for the reasons explained above. I am therefore refusing your application.
Thank you for the interest you have shown in Canada