b52shot said:
dpenabill,
I noticed in this thread and others you keep mentioning that any additional documents we bring in to the interview are unnecessary and won't be considered and you seem to be too confident about it. Did you personally experience this or know someone that experienced it?
The reason I'm asking is that when I submitted my application, I only submitted the requested documents as per the guide. In my case, I have multiple trips to the US and another country which I declared and have no entry stamps. I managed to get my entry records into those countries and planning to bring them along to the interview, otherwise the officer won't be able to match my declared trips with my passport, what's your input regarding this ? I'm planning to bring these entry records with me, do you think they would look at them ?
As I noted in this thread, and as I usually have in others (at least when I am careful),
there are possible exceptions.
Moreover, in terms of what documents an applicant brings to the interview/test, it is highly unlikely that bringing additional documents would cause any problems.
I have offered similar observations about including additional documents with the application itself. But I did include some extra documents in my application (CRA Notices of Assessment) and I did bring a
few extra documents to my interview. I do not know whether the CRA NoA made any difference at all in how my application was processed. My interview went very quickly, was relativley perfunctory, and I perceived no reason to bring up the additional documents I had in my bag.
My observations about this, however, are largely based on watching reports in multiple forums and noting that, for most, it usually seems there is no opportunity to present additional documents let alone any indication additional documents were presented, examined, and made a difference.
The exceptions are very few. However, most of those exceptions do seem to be travel history records. Very difficult to discern what the actual impact usually is . . . but there is an obvious explanation for this, for how difficult it is to discern the impact of bringing other country travel history records, and that is that how it goes will depend far more on many additional factors in the individual's case than just on the presentation of such documents.
In the meantime, the absence of stamps in the passport is common, far more common, these days. Other factors determine the extent to which IRCC is likely to see an issue in this regard.
My sense, nonetheless, is that either the interviewer is not seeing any problems, in which case extra documents would be more distraction than help, or the interviewer identifies some issue which will trigger a request for additional information and documents (CIT 0520 or full blown RQ, the CIT 0171), and additional documents will not preclude this. Remember, the interviewer is not engaged in a hearing. The interview is largely, if not almost entirely, a documents-verification examination.
But easy to read and assess travel history documents may be among the few exceptions which could help tip the scales favourably in a close case. I would not count on it, but it cannot hurt to have those available for reference.
Be sure to both carry the originals and a copy to leave with the interviewer.