can't agree with youscylla said:If there was any fraud committed by yourself and your employer - it's possible that your PR status could be revoked. For example, if your employer obtained an LMO, you can here but never worked for them and you faked salary payments - that could certainly be grounds for having your PR status revoked.
PR can certainly be revoked (even citizenship can be revoked) if CIC ever determines they were obtained through fraud. I'm not saying the OP obtained his PR through fraud. OP simply asked what circumstances could lead to PR being revoked and I answered that question.Need Canadian Pr said:can't agree with you
see his previous post he said already PR
AND he is no longer working with this company
so he is not under risk
Yes it is possible but where did found he supply fake documentsscylla said:PR can certainly be revoked (even citizenship can be revoked) if CIC ever determines they were obtained through fraud. I'm not saying the OP obtained his PR through fraud. OP simply asked what circumstances could lead to PR being revoked and I answered that question.
Need Canadian Pr said:Yes it is possible but where did found he supply fake documents
He is talking about LMO / LMIA and
He said the company got the inception by service Canada
So this is not CIC
Based on your previous posts, there was no fraud associated with your LMIA - correct? In other words, the LMIA was issued, you got a work permit and you came to Canad and worked for that employer as outlined in the LMIA - correct? If so, you have nothing to worry about.Hamid khan said:You both guys are telling different statement
So my question is who is correct
is it good or bad sign for company or employerevanstp9 said:http://www.esdc.gc.ca/en/foreign_workers/employers/employer_compliance.page#h2.1-h3.3
Reason for an inspection
An employer who received a positive LMIA on or after December 31, 2013, where the foreign worker has received a work permit and is/was working for the employer may be selected for an inspection.
There are three reasons an employer could be selected for an inspection:
there is reason to suspect non-compliance (i.e. a tip was received);
previous non-compliance; or
random selection.
Obviously if the reason for the inspection is either of the first two I mentioned, then it's not good.Need Canadian Pr said:is it good or bad sign for company or employer