EMPLOYMENT LETTER QUESTION!!! PLZ HELP!! THANK YOU!!

[mr. gerbil]

Hi all,

My company changed branding (including logo) in September. New logo looks similar to old one but a significant different can be seen.
I applied EE BC PNP in July using old logo letterhead and got nominated in Oct.
So when I ask for employment letter now, HR gives me with new logo on it. Also my salary increased too.

My questions is do I need to write a letter of explanation about these all changes?


More, in my checklist, they required:
- Offer of employment
- letter of employment
- employment records xxx (my job title)

The thing is that I'm already in Canada. Do I need to fill out the profile of section "INTENDED WORK IN CANADA"? I think this is the one that generates the "offer of employment"? In this section, they ask me to fill out the NOC number on my work permit, but my post-secondary work permit is open and no limitation on job choices. Maybe I should leave this section where asked me whether I have job offer in Canada as "NO"?

If I have to provide Offer, then it should be with my company's old logo on, right?

A bit confused. Any suggestions?

 

[adi1989]

Logo doesn't matter.
Cic understands that companies restructure and change their management.

You can write your current position in intended work in canada. So It doesn't matter
Lot of people who have already got their passport request answered yes to Job offer but not to Lmia.
So it doesn't matter either.

 

[mr. gerbil]

Logo doesn't matter.
Cic understands that companies restructure and change their management.

You can write your current position in intended work in canada. So It doesn't matter
Lot of people who have already got their passport request answered yes to Job offer but not to Lmia.
So it doesn't matter either.

Understood. Thanks.

 

[Ufa6174]

Writing a LOE wouldn't cost you anything, and frankly if I were you I'd write a few words to explain the difference. The last thing you'd want is someone questioning the legitimacy of your letters on the back of something you and I would both agree should be axiomatic.