Hello everyone,
I was searching the forum and have found some answers but wanted to be more clear. My wife is our primary applicant since she has a master degree and has a younger age. We have ECA and IELTS already.
While creating EE profile, she has a work history and she will get her reference letters but since my work experience does not bring us any points (outside of Canada), she will leave my work history as "no".
Our CRS seems to be above 460 with cic tool. (does not even ask my work history outside of Canada)
So during eAOR, we won't have to provide reference letters for my work (it is a hassle with my previous company and they are not willing to help, the previous company also merged with another one, translation of legal papers takes time and costs money etc)
I have seen people who move their dependant's work history to personal history with LOE (because they put it in EE profile first) but instead of doing this and confusing the visa officer, we thought of not putting it first.
What do you think? Do you think this is misrepresentation?
Is this a bad pre-ITA strategy since I seem unemployed at first. However, we plan to put my work history under my personal history (so no need for proof) in eAOR anyway.
Thank you in advance.
I was searching the forum and have found some answers but wanted to be more clear. My wife is our primary applicant since she has a master degree and has a younger age. We have ECA and IELTS already.
While creating EE profile, she has a work history and she will get her reference letters but since my work experience does not bring us any points (outside of Canada), she will leave my work history as "no".
Our CRS seems to be above 460 with cic tool. (does not even ask my work history outside of Canada)
So during eAOR, we won't have to provide reference letters for my work (it is a hassle with my previous company and they are not willing to help, the previous company also merged with another one, translation of legal papers takes time and costs money etc)
I have seen people who move their dependant's work history to personal history with LOE (because they put it in EE profile first) but instead of doing this and confusing the visa officer, we thought of not putting it first.
What do you think? Do you think this is misrepresentation?
Is this a bad pre-ITA strategy since I seem unemployed at first. However, we plan to put my work history under my personal history (so no need for proof) in eAOR anyway.
Thank you in advance.