+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Cut immigration applications to fix backlog, Kenney says

islenio

Star Member
Oct 19, 2010
151
3
Category........
Visa Office......
Mexico City
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
2-Aug-2011
AOR Received.
9-Nov-2011
File Transfer...
6-Oct-2011
Med's Done....
18-Jul-2011
Passport Req..
20-Jan-2012
VISA ISSUED...
30-Jan-2012
LANDED..........
4-Feb-2012
Here we go again!


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/10/20/pol-kenney-immigration-cut-applications.html


Canada needs to accept fewer applications from people wanting to live here, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney says, and he's eyeing the family class for cuts.

Canada is facing too big a backlog and, despite accepting 254,000 applications every year, there are one million people who are waiting to hear whether they can move to Canada, the citizenship and immigration minister said Thursday.

Canada gets about 420,000 applications every year and refuses about 10 per cent of those.

Speaking to the House committee on citizenship and immigration, Kenney said processing applications faster won't fix the backlog problem. And it isn't possible to accept enough people to deal with it either.

The only options, he said, are to vastly increase acceptances, or take fewer applications and keep processing the ones already received.

"Those are the only two possible solutions. It's a math problem," Kenney told reporters after the committee meeting.

Cut family class applications
Kenney pointed to the family class, under which parents and grandparents of Canadian citizens can immigrate. His department received 37,500 applications in 2010 but admits 18,500. Right now, there's a 10-year wait time for processing.

"Merely for us just to tread water, we would have to double the number of people coming into that program … and that wouldn't even reduce the backlog," he said.

Kenney said other countries require a minimal family income, private health insurance or a bond to limit parent and grandparent applications.

Immigration lawyer Richard Kurland said Kenney's right to suggest a cap on the parents and grandparents category.

"Unless you solve the intake problem, you're going to have a growing backlog with growing processing times and it's time to bite the bullet," he told reporters after the committee meeting.

Kurland said a 20,000 cap is appropriate, and that the government should break the applicants into categories.

"Bring in as priority one the single parents overseas. Priority two is you bring in parents where the families can pony up $75,000 up front to defray medicare costs, either with permanent resident visa on payment or [for $75,000] give that family a 10-year visitor visa to Canada and that way they can be here waiting until their number comes up in the immigration inventory overseas."

Speaking to Rosemary Barton on CBC's Power & Politics, Kenney called the $75,000 payment "a very interesting idea."

"I’ve heard similar ideas about asking people to share in a greater portion of the social and health-care costs. And maybe that’s one practical way of bringing more fairness while limiting the number of new applications so we can avoid the big backlogs. That’s a very valid idea," he said.

The Conservative government and previous Liberal governments averaged about 18,000 parent and grandparent entrants a year, he added.

Kenney says the department is launching consultations on cutting the backlog.

NDP immigration critic Don Davies said reducing parent and grandparent applications is the wrong way to go.

"What I object to the most is the minister has come into this so-called study, these meetings, with a preconceived conclusion. The only policy tool that he's looking at is capping applications. Well, that's not the only policy tool available to the minister," Davies said.

He wants Canada to accept another 100,000 immigrants every year, arguing a per capita measurement doesn't make sense because the country has so much space.
 

locolynn

Hero Member
May 19, 2008
412
16
Category........
Visa Office......
Rabat
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
24-04-07
AOR Received.
08-06-07
Interview........
06-12-07/09-24-08/09-27-11
islenio said:
Here we go again!


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/10/20/pol-kenney-immigration-cut-applications.html


He wants Canada to accept another 100,000 immigrants every year, arguing a per capita measurement doesn't make sense because the country has so much space.
Normally I find myself siding with the NDP...but this just doesn't make logical sense. We have lots of space so don't cap parents and grandparents? What would you have them do - set out into the wild west and build mud houses and sow the land? We're talking parents and grandparents here - not pioneers.
Not that I'm siding with the Conservatives (ugh I think I just threw up a little in my mouth at the thought). But I guess I was hoping for a bit more from our official opposition.

Lynn
 
M

mrandmrsromero

Guest
locolynn said:
Not that I'm siding with the Conservatives (ugh I think I just threw up a little in my mouth at the thought).
:D LOL
 

Stumpedmom

Hero Member
Sep 16, 2010
541
14
Category........
Visa Office......
Buffalo
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
22/03/2011 Receivd CPC-M
AOR Received.
16/06/2011
File Transfer...
06/05/2011 Received in Buffalo, 06/2011 to Los Angeles
Med's Done....
12/10/2010
Interview........
waived...obviously cuz we got the PPR
Passport Req..
16/8/2011
VISA ISSUED...
24/8/2011 in our hands 8/29/2011
LANDED..........
3/9/2011
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/worth-reading-t86210.0.html

Here is a link to another discussion going on here on the same article....
 

cndcit

Full Member
Sep 16, 2010
25
0
Interesting reading,cutting the parents and grandparents would make sense to the government because there is less potential for them to collect lots of tax dollars. I guess Kenney is right when he says it is a math problem,not enough long term tax dollars coming in from that sponsorship class. Families paying 75,000 to get other family here! Wow that is quite a bribe but it would help to make up for those lost tax dollars.
 

Cheers

Full Member
May 11, 2011
24
3
This is no way to reduce backlog, money replaces human rights. Now to me, if I pay $10000 instead of $1200 when sponsoring my spouse, the case should be decided within a very short time or they gave him/her the visa for 10 years. I know they are not talking about spouse immigration but soon they will. I may have that kind of money but what happens to those who don't have, they can't bring in their families or it will take them for ever???

Get that right- immigration (to Canada and Canadian politicians) was, is and will never be about uniting families, it is about money, it is a way to earn big bucks, trying to fix/partially fix the domestic gross expense by earning from immigration.......they are trying to get more..thats all.

You want to decrease backlog and don't want to cover the medical cost, here it is: have them sign a legal document declaring they will cover the medical cost for 10 years. Or give them conditional permanent residency.

This is just another crap from Hon. Kenney.