+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Any law to support an employee under implied status who is fired by employer?

gavin_cic

Star Member
Dec 23, 2014
199
5
Category........
NOC Code......
4012
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
20 Nov, 2014
Doc's Request.
28 May, 2015
Nomination.....
PER on 10 Feb, 2015
Med's Request
28 May, 2015
Med's Done....
15 June, 2015 (TLU: 30 June, 2015)
Passport Req..
11 Jan, 2016
LANDED..........
1 Feb, 2016
My wife is working at a local store in Saskatchewan, and her work permit will expire from September.
She has applied for extending it, so she will live in Canada legally under the implied status until a decision is made by CIC.

The store where my wife is working is going to fire her because of the implied status, which is a disaster for my family.
Is there a law in Canada or Saskatchewan that can support my wife's right as a legal worker under the implied status?

MANY thanks for your kind help!!!!
 

zardoz

VIP Member
Feb 2, 2013
13,298
2,167
Canada
Category........
FAM
Visa Office......
London
App. Filed.......
16-02-2013
VISA ISSUED...
31-07-2013
LANDED..........
09-11-2013
gavin_cic said:
My wife is working at a local store in Saskatchewan, and her work permit will expire from September.
She has applied for extending it, so she will live in Canada legally under the implied status until a decision is made by CIC.

The store where my wife is working is going to fire her because of the implied status, which is a disaster for my family.
Is there a law in Canada or Saskatchewan that can support my wife's right as a legal worker under the implied status?

MANY thanks for your kind help!!!!
On what basis has she applied for an extension? Does she expect it to be extended, or is this application expected to be refused?
 

scylla

VIP Member
Jun 8, 2010
95,972
22,202
Toronto
Category........
Visa Office......
Buffalo
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
28-05-2010
AOR Received.
19-08-2010
File Transfer...
28-06-2010
Passport Req..
01-10-2010
VISA ISSUED...
05-10-2010
LANDED..........
05-10-2010
There is no law that specifically protects workers who are on implied status.

Whatever rights your wife has fall under the general employment laws for Saskatchewan.
 

gavin_cic

Star Member
Dec 23, 2014
199
5
Category........
NOC Code......
4012
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
20 Nov, 2014
Doc's Request.
28 May, 2015
Nomination.....
PER on 10 Feb, 2015
Med's Request
28 May, 2015
Med's Done....
15 June, 2015 (TLU: 30 June, 2015)
Passport Req..
11 Jan, 2016
LANDED..........
1 Feb, 2016
Absolutely expect it to be extended so that she will also be able to work after a decision is made on her application.
 

gavin_cic

Star Member
Dec 23, 2014
199
5
Category........
NOC Code......
4012
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
20 Nov, 2014
Doc's Request.
28 May, 2015
Nomination.....
PER on 10 Feb, 2015
Med's Request
28 May, 2015
Med's Done....
15 June, 2015 (TLU: 30 June, 2015)
Passport Req..
11 Jan, 2016
LANDED..........
1 Feb, 2016
If I am not wrong, the problem is equivalent to whether, in S.K., an employer can fire an employee - who neither misconducts nor loses a permit to work.

scylla said:
There is no law that specifically protects workers who are on implied status.

Whatever rights your wife has fall under the general employment laws for Saskatchewan.
 

gavin_cic

Star Member
Dec 23, 2014
199
5
Category........
NOC Code......
4012
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
App. Filed.......
20 Nov, 2014
Doc's Request.
28 May, 2015
Nomination.....
PER on 10 Feb, 2015
Med's Request
28 May, 2015
Med's Done....
15 June, 2015 (TLU: 30 June, 2015)
Passport Req..
11 Jan, 2016
LANDED..........
1 Feb, 2016
Thx for your kind replies anyway!!!

scylla said:
There is no law that specifically protects workers who are on implied status.

Whatever rights your wife has fall under the general employment laws for Saskatchewan.
zardoz said:
On what basis has she applied for an extension? Does she expect it to be extended, or is this application expected to be refused?