Search results

Hey there, I am also a september 2017 outland conjugal partner sponsorship. Have you got your passport request yet?

We sent in a reply to the procedural fairness June 1. Today, July 7, my partners account went to processing background check and he was sent a pre-arrival services letter. Is this good news? Any comments...? Thanks

Thank you, I think we are planning to talk about a court marriage shortly, when I see him again in a few weeks. However, I’m going to Italy. Would a marriage certificate there be okay you think as well? As far as a visitor for a year, I don’t think he could sit there and not work for all that...

Maybe I will copy and paste the wording when I have a chance. Live in Canada for one year as a visitor? Rather get married in court lol! Thank you

Also, in regards to the procedural fairness, IRCC asked for us to provide additional information about: 1. How we are mutually interdependent (because we don’t share finances), we explained we are socially and emotionally. 2. Why we have chosen not to live together. Here we explained that we...

What do you mean by that could change this case???

Hello commonlaw2018, Please get your facts straight before posting things that are incorrect. I have not posted my story anywhere else. Especially on a Africanada site... neither of us are African. I am reading what people have to say. However, it’s hard to accept opinions and/or ideas when...

You can request to change it to common-law??? I put all of our reasoning of why we went with conjugal instead of common law in response to the procedural fairness... but I could email them asking their opinion... maybe they will answer, probably not. I have yet to come across other people in...

Living situation: April 2016 -June 2016: on ship August 2016: Italy, partners apparetment October -November 2016: ship January - April 2017: ship April - May 2017: Canada with family, Italy air bnb June -September 2017: ship October 14-January 2, 2017: Italy, air bnb. And Canada, with family...

Yes ours can perform on land (cruise ships). But I would assume that if we did that and applied as a spouse, IRCC wouldn’t be happy that it’s not a wedding with family, friends, wedding party etc....? our

At the time of application We didn’t have 12 consecutive months, because our contracts break us apart sometimes. After the application we did reach 12 months together, with 2 periods of 2 weeks apart.

We have lived together the majority of the time aboard a ship, where we don’t pay bills, have leases, possessions etc. Then, when we’re on land together, we stay with family or air bnb’s. It’s true we have lived together, but don’t know how to present this to cic to prove that we are common law...

Also, we have a right to not get married if we don’t want to. We prefer to be common law first and have a proper wedding after we have a job and a roof over our heads which is kind of priority. IRCC cannot force this. A simple court marriage will not satisfy IRCC.

This is the problem.... even you guys who are posting replies aren’t reading our situation.... Our work keeps us together. We are common law and have lived together for more than one year continuously. Due to the nature of how we lived together, we cannot claim common-law.

My partner does not seem eligible to come to Canada under any federal programs.

Our jobs are the only thing keeping us together in the same place. If we quit our jobs, we won't be together.... I've made another post explaining this.

We met in March 2016 on board our ship. We began seeing each other April 3, 2016. I, the sponsor, 29, (female), am a Citizen, born and raised in Canada. The applicant (male), 30, is Italian. I began to sleep over in his room immediately, and by early to mid-May 2016, I moved my things in. On...

Hey guys, Just wanted to know about other conjugal partnership applications. We have them all the required information that was asked for in the application, then 2 months ago we got a procedural fairness and asked us for more documentation. They said we appear to be dating but might not be in...