Search results

Indeed, C-6 doesn't receive a mention in the Projected Order of Business for June 8, 2017. It looks like C-45 (thanks for the correction, Spyfy) got stretched out to another day due to a deferred vote on a proposed amendment that was requested to be recorded on division. (At least I'm learning...

One additional, possible reason why the due process amendment may be further changed by the HoC is the Federal Court case that struck down due process provisions in the previous government's Bill C-24. This case concluded on May 10, 2017, after the Senate adopted their due process amendment. It...

The closure motions were passed, limiting debate on C-45 (concluded Tuesday at 5:11pm) and C-44 (still 3hrs 15mins left for debate). Disappointingly, the Projected Order of Business for Wednesday, June 7 still does not include any mention of C-6, though it does cover the remaining debate for...

According to the Order Paper for June 5, today the government gave notice of a "time allocation motion pursuant to Standing Order 78(3)" for both C-45 and C-44. These are the two bills the Government House Leader Bardish Chagger indicated on June 1 would be dealt with before C-6. Under Standing...

Today, June 1, at 3:11 PM in the House of Commons, the Government House Leader Bardish Chagger mentioned, in response to a question as to the Government's plans for the remaining sittings in June, that next week (week starting June 5) the Government hopes to address C-6 after dealing with two...