+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Search results

  1. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    It might not be stupid but it don't make sense that I cannot be with my family just because of one mistake. They should have considerations on cases like this. Like some sort of background investigation or something. They are breaking families apart is what they do. You can't tell because you're...
  2. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    that sucks big time! stupid country.
  3. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Here is the definition of dependent children according to CIC Dependent children Refers to the children of the applicant or those of the spouse or common-law partner. They must: -be under the age of 22 and not have a spouse or common-law partner, or -depend substantially on the financial...
  4. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Thanks Ponga for your kind words. Thanks to all of everyone who gives advise as well. I'm thinking of talking to a lawyer then if he/she advises me not to appeal because it might revoke my wife PR, I won't. Then I would have to find other way to migrate and one option is to apply for a job or...
  5. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    So Sweden are you saying that I do not have a fighting chance on this? We did not mistakenly not declare me on their application so it's not ignoring the law. We did it on purpose because we don't have anything to prove that we are on a CL relationship.
  6. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Exactly my point Ponga. If someone applies for CL then they have to prove right? Which is the very reason that we didn't declare it in the first application we CANNOT prove it. There is NO proof.
  7. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    I am not going to say that we didn't live from feb 2010 which I already stated on the initial application, what I'm gonna say is that we cannot prove that we are a common law partner since we cannot prove it. There is no documentation to prove it and she is still depending on her parents.
  8. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Thanks for the response DuberBlue. I would like to clarify your statement below. Are you saying I should not respond to their email or appeal to that. They have given me 45 days to appeal and send documents that I was declared as common law partner. However I was not really declared and what I...
  9. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Here is the definition of Common law partner according to Guide 3999 in cic website Common-law partner Refers to a person who is living in a conjugal relationship with another person (opposite or same sex), and has done so continuously for a period of at least one year. A conjugal relationship...
  10. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Please help if I still got a fighting chance on this. I am currently writing the letter that I will send to the immigration along with documentation of the house that we live in together which is not in our name and the bills which are also not in our name. Any suggestion would be very helpful...
  11. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Any help for a difficult case? I would appreciate it very much. Thanks!
  12. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    Please help. If I get denied in this it might rip our family apart :(
  13. R

    Possible Denial Paragraph 117(9)(d)

    I received an email from immigration saying that i might be excluded from family class. Their reason is that me and my wife were living together since February 2010 and during their application for visa I was not examined and was not declared as common law partner. My wife obtained permanent...