Search results

Just saying that Canada doesn't owe you anything doesn't mean that Canadian law or government is perfectly right in whatever way they have dealt with the backlog applicants! Actually they have failed utterly on all grounds and therefore they resorted to cunning procedure of making a law for...

Please read FAQs on International Court of Justice: http://www.icj-cij.org/information/index.php?p1=7&p2=2

Any latest relevant news for pre-Feb 2008 backlog cases? Positive or negative? When it will be clearly out for all the applicants? Hope for the best this time!!! Please update any news as soon as it is available! Thanks!

Good news should come for all; whether litigants or non-litigants! Justice means if someone has done wrong and injustice with so many individuals (around 3,00,000), law should look into the matter impartiality and reverse any unjust decision or action taken! If termination of backlog was wrong...

Hi! I am also a non-litigant aged 52 years now and I applied in December 2007. I have similar case. I think points at the time of application are taken into account and not on the date of processing. Also, the rules at the time of application are applicable and new rules are not applicable...

Sir! Will there be no hope for non litigant backlog cases who applied before 27 February 2008 or there is still some hope for them also? Please do clarify and update any news in this regard as soon as available & feasible! Thanks!!!!!

Is there still any hope left for the class action lawsuit for pre-Feb 2008 applicants or it is all over? If it is all over, then there is no use continuing this group! Please update relevant and latest developments if any! Please do clear if any hope is still there! Thanks and regards!

Please read and see yourself: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/op/op10-eng.pdf especially: 5.1. Legislative basis – Residency obligation of OP 10 Permanent Residency Status Determination It will clear all your queries!

Thanks Msaeed for your concern and best wishes! Same to you Sir! It seems to me that CIC and immigration minister have got Bill C-38 passed and nobody can challenge it through higher courts to change it or strike it down. Inspite of intent behind its passing and inspite of its being unfair; it...

Thanks Zardoz! I was asking: Can Section 87.4(1) of Bill C-38 be challenged in a future parliamentary session or in higher courts and ultimately be struck down? Can a section of a Bill be amended or struck down if it is unfair to any person or group of persons? Or if it was framed with intent...

Thanks! And what about the second question? Please do comment!

Actually I wanted a response from PMM for my previous message! Okay thanks Zardoz! I want to know the opinions of all senior members of this blog. You are also one of them! What does this mean? Bill C-38 Section 87.4(3) The fact that an application is terminated under subsection (1) does not...

Thanks PMM! I read the ruling by Justice Phelan. I can understand and see through all the things that are going on. I know I am nobody and I cannot change anything in the process of law or litigation that is going on between applicants/litigants and CIC/Government of Canada. But there are...

According to MI or Ministerial Instructions in Bill C-50, CIC can process "post Bill C-50 applications" in any desired order, prefer and process faster some applications and ignore or delay others or terminate them without processing with refund of their money if they "applied on or after 27...

But if you see ministerial instructions (MI), it is evident that they apply to FSW who applied or will apply on or after 27 February 2008 and do not apply to refugees' applications or applications on humanitarian ground applied from within Canada! CIC can process post Bill C-50 applications in...

You are all right; but what I want to say is that litigants and non-litigants both are applicants. If the government or CIC or both plan to terminate any applicant (whether he is litigant or not) it should be after accessing and processing only. Terminating any applicant without accessing and...

Thanks for your kind response! This means we have to wait and watch whether we are litigants or not. If FCA rules against CIC's decision to terminate unaccessed pre-Feb backlog applicants; then CIC will again start processing those cases according to the law or rules at the time of their...

Dear PMM, Hi! I have applied as FSW in January 2008. You are a very intelligent and informed person on this blog and I hope you can best guide me. I want to know about the status and scope of pre-February 2008 FSW backlog litigation. There are many individual groups going on separately. I...

Dear Hopefulever, Please inform us about the appeal in pre-February 2008 FSW backlog litigation. Will the decision of the appeal be applicable to the litigants only or it will apply to all the applicants in the backlog; before 27 February 2008 or after it. Is it really a Class Action suit...

I want to request all the members of this blog and especially the senior members who are Champion, VIP, or Hero members that please do not try to humiliate someone who is ignorant and ambitious just because you are not in pre-Feb 2008 backlog and you are not affected by the law to vipe out the...