Well there are million of excuses if they don't want to do something. Government will be blamed if they do good Government will be blamed if they do bad. Human right lawyers didn't go to roads to protest how COVID has taken people's freedom so Human rights lawyer will not come to roads if IRCC take consent from the applicant and make this optional like whoever wants to take this.As an applicant, I am certainly hoping everything could speed up. However, I am only afraid that should any of these measures (e.g. 3) through 5)) be even proposed, the opposition and "human rights lawyers" would waste no time in attacking the government. It is perhaps also unfair to compare the citizenship test to the AAMC tests (e.g. MCAT, USMLE) mentioned earlier in the thread. The CIC test seems to be more of a ceremonial significance and tradition formality than it is an "exam".
I am confident that the CIC must have contingency plans for situations like this, but they are just slow or not keen on implementing one.
In the defence of the CIC bureaucrats.
If anything goes wrong with the online test (e.g. connection, accessibility, time zone, "cheating", etc), the CIC gets the blame.
If any applicant gets sick due to writing the test, the CIC gets the blame.
If any CIC worker gets sick due to working, the CIC gets the blame. I rather not to have this happening, as it would otherwise be exploited as a real excuse for another shutting down.
Then it might as well just do nothing, where only the fearless COVID gets the blame, and the CIC remains a caring employer and beacon for ensuring public health and safety (with sarcasm of course).
With respect to ceremonial experience, Oath Ceremonies which are more traditional and ceremonial based have been shifted to online version so that point is also nullified.