Yeah, I’ve been pondering these elements too.
Also, an empirical thing I learned through the “internal trackers” built in previous Ray of Hope threads: In the range of 465-469, the 469 score appears to be the more “unlikely” or them. For example, on the last of all trackers, from 33 entries in that range, the vast majority were 468 and 467 (both with 10-11 entries each), and then 466 and 465 with 4-5 each, and 469 with only 3. Also, there were many more 470-471 in the tracker than 469 as well.
It looks like the “standard profiles” variations (married, <30yr, 2 diplomas, CLB9/CLB10) scores does not bring you to 469, but instead to 468 or 470.
I have 469, but because I lost 5 points for being 30yrs old, which is a more “unusual” way to achieve 469.
So, maybe 469 is indeed an “uncrowed” score. I hope I’m right.