Yes..thats what it looks like. At the max they are taking 80 days for medicals.
AOR in April 2017 - Let's Connect Here!
- Thread starter TorontoPunjabi
- Start date
I guess it's the same with fsw inland.. what do you think?? It's taking more time for fsw inland compared to fsw Outland
If you read the conversations from the previous 10 pages, we have been discussing the same. FSW-I is treated along with FSW-O US Applicants.
What is your AOR?
I m with AOR Apr 17 US Applicant ..waiting for the my medicals to be cleared..Hoping to get it cleared by this week.
If you say so for US residents, what would you say for the actual Inland applicants? They are pretty much at home! Even their cases are delayed.
I think they have a clear processing priority.. CEC, FSW O, FSW I and PNP.
Ok, I am just waiting for it and checking the tracker everyday to see if there is any progress.
I think I can expect medicals to pass in the first week of July.
I think I can expect medicals to pass in the first week of July.
Michellehj90
Full Member
Hello guys,
My additional docs section shows additional docs required but cant find any message or place to upload anything. So the bug that was there during the update of cic website still persists?
Hope to hear from someone.
My additional docs section shows additional docs required but cant find any message or place to upload anything. So the bug that was there during the update of cic website still persists?
Hope to hear from someone.
Guys my Meds passed on May 24th, BGC changed to "We are processing your background check. We will send you a message if we need more information" same day I was requested to provide an RCMP PCC which I submitted on June 9th, then Passport copy requested and submitted on June 14th. On June 20th ADR updated to "No additional documents required"
So it is obvious that they repeatedly went through my application, so I am not sure if this is IP 1 or IP 2. Also any FSWO were requested RCMP? Could I be stuck at security screening or it only starts after BGC changes to NA? I am FSWO applicant, previously lived in Canada.
So it is obvious that they repeatedly went through my application, so I am not sure if this is IP 1 or IP 2. Also any FSWO were requested RCMP? Could I be stuck at security screening or it only starts after BGC changes to NA? I am FSWO applicant, previously lived in Canada.
Here you go.........check if this goes with 2281.Yeah dude, same worry here.
Maybe you could post your duties and the NOC description, so that we could give you an objective opinion. I suppose case officer who is reviewing your docs does not have much idea about your role as we do. So we could pretend to be a case officer
I opened a thread, but no one relied me yet.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/please-help-to-determine-whether-working-experience-match-with-noc.502811/
During his/her employment with ABC Ltd, he/she was responsible for the following: - (maximum 5 points)
1. Implementing NetApp Snapmirror technology to Migrate data to Disaster Recovery location.
2. Using NETBACKUP tool to take backup of servers and the Local Area Network (LAN) shares in the environment and perform data restore operations when data loss occurs.
3. Upgrading NetApp Data ONTAP Operating system to newer version for better performance of the storage system and bug fixes.
4. Hands of experience with NetApp SAN Systems (Storage Area Networks) FAS3140, FAS3240, FA6240, FAS8080 and data management and monitoring tools such as NetApp Operations manager and Netapp OnCommand Balance.
5. Perform troubleshooting for any issues impacting NetApp SAN systems and its customer base.
He/She utilized skills including :- ( maximum 2 points)
1. NetApp SAN systems for provisioning storage to Linux, Windows and VMware hosts.
2. NETBACKUP backup tool for taking backup of servers in the environment.
@kaimainz @KiranK @johnsyk @astralsource Now you all are CIC officers reviewing my reference letter.
Well according to this officer, PPR be issued to this candidate immediately!Here you go.........check if this goes with 2281.
During his/her employment with ABC Ltd, he/she was responsible for the following: - (maximum 5 points)
1. Implementing NetApp Snapmirror technology to Migrate data to Disaster Recovery location.
2. Using NETBACKUP tool to take backup of servers and the Local Area Network (LAN) shares in the environment and perform data restore operations when data loss occurs.
3. Upgrading NetApp Data ONTAP Operating system to newer version for better performance of the storage system and bug fixes.
4. Hands of experience with NetApp SAN Systems (Storage Area Networks) FAS3140, FAS3240, FA6240, FAS8080 and data management and monitoring tools such as NetApp Operations manager and Netapp OnCommand Balance.
5. Perform troubleshooting for any issues impacting NetApp SAN systems and its customer base.
He/She utilized skills including :- ( maximum 2 points)
1. NetApp SAN systems for provisioning storage to Linux, Windows and VMware hosts.
2. NETBACKUP backup tool for taking backup of servers in the environment.
@kaimainz @KiranK @johnsyk @astralsource Now you all are CIC officers reviewing my reference letter.
Anyway, seriously, I studied very carefully and closely, now as reviewing officer who will definitely not be knowing all these technical terns, i could easily make out that- lead statement was covered, your 70-75% main duties are a perfect match (obviously not in words but in terms of what actually was being done.) Apart from only 3-4 duties out of 12 main duties were not found, rest were all perfectly included in some way or another in your reference letter.
In my opinion this the perfect letter as nothing seems fishy about the duties, they do not look to be forcibly matched, the percentage of match is perfect, So in conclusion the picture that gets created here is genuine, no negative sign. I think your PPR is done deal mate!
From a person with no professional insight into these terms, I can tell you for sure that the nature of job is clearly understandable and can be easily matched. Let's wait for others now.
Also please do tell me as you are the professional here, was my analysis of your duties correct or wrong?
Well according to this officer, PPR be issued to this candidate immediately!
Anyway, seriously, I studied very carefully and closely, now as reviewing officer who will definitely not be knowing all these technical terns, i could easily make out that- lead statement was covered, your 70-75% main duties are a perfect match (obviously not in words but in terms of what actually was being done.) Apart from only 3-4 duties out of 12 main duties were not found, rest were all perfectly included in some way or another in your reference letter.
In my opinion this the perfect letter as nothing seems fishy about the duties, they do not look to be forcibly matched, the percentage of match is perfect, So in conclusion the picture that gets created here is genuine, no negative sign. I think your PPR is done deal mate!
From a person with no professional insight into these terms, I can tell you for sure that the nature of job is clearly understandable and can be easily matched. Let's wait for others now.
Also please do tell me as you are the professional here, was my analysis of your duties correct or wrong?
Thanks Kiran.!!!! Your analysis was very good. Actually I had my letter written in a very simple way so that a person without any datacenter knowledge can undersatnd easily . It really felt good that you metioned that.
Now @comfortablynumb wants to buy the CIC officer a beer.